From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steven Rostedt Subject: Re: [PATCH RT 3/4] mips-remove-smp-reserve-lock.patch Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 14:56:39 -0400 Message-ID: <1339095399.13377.2.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> References: <20120607155148.698959275@goodmis.org> <20120607155221.836885041@goodmis.org> <4FD0E9F9.60906@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users , Thomas Gleixner , Carsten Emde , John Kacur , Ralf Baechle To: David Daney Return-path: Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.122]:27576 "EHLO hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754428Ab2FGS4l (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jun 2012 14:56:41 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4FD0E9F9.60906@gmail.com> Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 10:50 -0700, David Daney wrote: > On 06/07/2012 08:51 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > From: Thomas Gleixner > > > > Instead of making the lock raw, remove it as it protects nothing. > > I don't know how you guys are managing the RT branch, but this seems > quite similar to: > > a3c8b4faeeccb33dbad6969bc9e50bf409f167e7 (MIPS: Cavium: Remove > smp_reserve_lock.) Great! Then we don't need to worry about it :-) But as it doesn't seem that this patch was marked as stable, we will be carrying it in -rt where we support older kernels. Should it go to mainline stable? -- Steve > > David Daney >