From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Galbraith Subject: Re: Question regarding 'sched: RT throttling activated' Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 20:10:29 +0200 Message-ID: <1347387029.7018.53.camel@marge.simpson.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, John Kacur , Josef Baumgartner To: Wolfgang Wallner Return-path: Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.23]:42408 "HELO mailout-de.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1757729Ab2IKSKf (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Sep 2012 14:10:35 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 17:34 +0200, Wolfgang Wallner wrote: > >> My questions are now: > >> > >> * What does this logging entry mean? > >> Could you please point me to some information about RT throttling > >> so that I can understand what's it about? > > > With stock settings, it means realtime task[s] consumed > 95% of the > > throttle interval (1s), so the throttle activated, allowing > SCHED_NORMAL > > tasks to have a sip of CPU, to let you try to save the box from > nutty RT > > CPU hogs. See kernel/sched_rt.c. > > I think if the application turns into a cpu hog... Where from comes 'if'? You presented evidence, so methinks there's not a _lot_ of room for an 'if', there's just a missing 'why'. -Mike