From: Ivo Sieben <meltedpianoman@gmail.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
<linux-serial@vger.kernel.org>,
RT <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Ivo Sieben <meltedpianoman@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH-v2] tty: prevent unnecessary work queue lock checking on flip buffer copy
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 14:01:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1348574506-23625-1-git-send-email-meltedpianoman@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMSQXEGEf8xSYZa+0N77K-Ld5xHLefyMHtK6FxcKCqNhpnMp6g@mail.gmail.com>
In case of PREEMPT_RT or when low_latency flag is set by the serial driver
the TTY receive flip buffer is copied to the line discipline directly
instead of using a work queue in the background. Therefor only in case a
workqueue is actually used for copying data to the line discipline
we'll have to check & wait for the workqueue to finish.
This prevents unnecessary spin lock/unlock on the workqueue spin lock that can
cause additional scheduling overhead on a PREEMPT_RT system. On a 240 MHz
AT91SAM9261 processor setup this fixes about 100us of scheduling overhead on the
TTY read call.
Signed-off-by: Ivo Sieben <meltedpianoman@gmail.com>
---
v2:
Patch v1 was based on the fact that only the tty_flip_buffer_push() function
was used to copy dat to the line discipline because I removed the
tty_schedule_flip() in my previous patch "[PATCH] tty: cleanup duplicate
functions in tty_buffer". Since that patched turned out to be invalid, I had
to implement this functionality differently.
drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c | 17 ++++++++++++++---
include/linux/tty.h | 3 ++-
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c b/drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c
index 6146e8b..dee77b4 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c
@@ -354,6 +354,7 @@ void tty_schedule_flip(struct tty_struct *tty)
tty->buf.tail->commit = tty->buf.tail->used;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tty->buf.lock, flags);
schedule_work(&tty->buf.work);
+ atomic_set(&tty->buf.flush_work, 1);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(tty_schedule_flip);
@@ -514,7 +515,14 @@ static void flush_to_ldisc(struct work_struct *work)
*/
void tty_flush_to_ldisc(struct tty_struct *tty)
{
- flush_work(&tty->buf.work);
+ /*
+ * The work queue is not always used to move data from the flip buffer
+ * to the line discipline: the tty_flip_buffer_push() will call the
+ * flush_to_ldisc() routine directly when low_latency flag is set.
+ * Therefor only flush the work queue when required.
+ */
+ if (atomic_xchg(&tty->buf.flush_work, 0))
+ flush_work(&tty->buf.work);
}
/**
@@ -538,10 +546,12 @@ void tty_flip_buffer_push(struct tty_struct *tty)
tty->buf.tail->commit = tty->buf.tail->used;
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tty->buf.lock, flags);
- if (tty->low_latency)
+ if (tty->low_latency) {
flush_to_ldisc(&tty->buf.work);
- else
+ } else {
schedule_work(&tty->buf.work);
+ atomic_set(&tty->buf.flush_work, 1);
+ }
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(tty_flip_buffer_push);
@@ -563,5 +573,6 @@ void tty_buffer_init(struct tty_struct *tty)
tty->buf.free = NULL;
tty->buf.memory_used = 0;
INIT_WORK(&tty->buf.work, flush_to_ldisc);
+ atomic_set(&tty->buf.flush_work, 0);
}
diff --git a/include/linux/tty.h b/include/linux/tty.h
index 21bceef..f76ac5e 100644
--- a/include/linux/tty.h
+++ b/include/linux/tty.h
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@
#include <linux/tty_driver.h>
#include <linux/tty_ldisc.h>
#include <linux/mutex.h>
-
+#include <linux/atomic.h>
/*
@@ -86,6 +86,7 @@ struct tty_buffer {
struct tty_bufhead {
struct work_struct work;
+ atomic_t flush_work;
raw_spinlock_t lock;
struct tty_buffer *head; /* Queue head */
struct tty_buffer *tail; /* Active buffer */
--
1.7.9.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-25 12:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-20 14:02 [PATCH] tty: prevent unnecessary work queue lock checking on flip buffer copy Ivo Sieben
2012-09-20 16:33 ` Alan Cox
2012-09-24 9:33 ` Ivo Sieben
2012-09-25 12:01 ` Ivo Sieben [this message]
2012-09-25 13:06 ` [PATCH-v2] " Alan Cox
2012-09-25 14:39 ` Ivo Sieben
2012-09-25 14:47 ` Alan Cox
2012-09-27 11:58 ` [PATCH-v3] " Ivo Sieben
2012-09-27 12:02 ` Ivo Sieben
2012-10-22 23:47 ` Greg KH
2012-10-23 10:16 ` Alan Cox
2012-10-24 12:35 ` [PATCH] [tty]: Report warning when low_latency flag is wrongly used Ivo Sieben
2012-10-24 14:32 ` Paul Gortmaker
2012-10-24 18:22 ` [PATCH-v3] tty: prevent unnecessary work queue lock checking on flip buffer copy Greg KH
2012-09-27 13:15 ` Alan Cox
2012-09-27 16:53 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1348574506-23625-1-git-send-email-meltedpianoman@gmail.com \
--to=meltedpianoman@gmail.com \
--cc=alan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).