* [PATCH] tty: Use raw spin lock to protect TTY ldisc administration
@ 2012-09-20 14:05 Ivo Sieben
2012-10-17 12:03 ` [REPOST] " Ivo Sieben
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ivo Sieben @ 2012-09-20 14:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alan Cox, Greg KH, linux-serial, RT; +Cc: Ivo Sieben
The global "normal" spin lock that guards the line discipline
administration is replaced by a raw spin lock. On a PREEMPT_RT system this
prevents unwanted scheduling overhead around the line discipline administration.
On a 240 MHz AT91SAM9261 processor setup this fixes about 100us of scheduling
overhead on a TTY read or write call.
Signed-off-by: Ivo Sieben <meltedpianoman@gmail.com>
---
drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c b/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c
index 6f99c99..12cfde6 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
* callers who will do ldisc lookups and cannot sleep.
*/
-static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(tty_ldisc_lock);
+static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(tty_ldisc_lock);
static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(tty_ldisc_wait);
/* Line disc dispatch table */
static struct tty_ldisc_ops *tty_ldiscs[NR_LDISCS];
@@ -49,21 +49,21 @@ static void put_ldisc(struct tty_ldisc *ld)
* If this is the last user, free the ldisc, and
* release the ldisc ops.
*
- * We really want an "atomic_dec_and_lock_irqsave()",
+ * We really want an "atomic_dec_and_raw_lock_irqsave()",
* but we don't have it, so this does it by hand.
*/
- local_irq_save(flags);
- if (atomic_dec_and_lock(&ld->users, &tty_ldisc_lock)) {
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&tty_ldisc_lock, flags);
+ if (atomic_dec_and_test(&ld->users)) {
struct tty_ldisc_ops *ldo = ld->ops;
ldo->refcount--;
module_put(ldo->owner);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tty_ldisc_lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tty_ldisc_lock, flags);
kfree(ld);
return;
}
- local_irq_restore(flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tty_ldisc_lock, flags);
wake_up(&ld->wq_idle);
}
@@ -88,11 +88,11 @@ int tty_register_ldisc(int disc, struct tty_ldisc_ops *new_ldisc)
if (disc < N_TTY || disc >= NR_LDISCS)
return -EINVAL;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&tty_ldisc_lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&tty_ldisc_lock, flags);
tty_ldiscs[disc] = new_ldisc;
new_ldisc->num = disc;
new_ldisc->refcount = 0;
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tty_ldisc_lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tty_ldisc_lock, flags);
return ret;
}
@@ -118,12 +118,12 @@ int tty_unregister_ldisc(int disc)
if (disc < N_TTY || disc >= NR_LDISCS)
return -EINVAL;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&tty_ldisc_lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&tty_ldisc_lock, flags);
if (tty_ldiscs[disc]->refcount)
ret = -EBUSY;
else
tty_ldiscs[disc] = NULL;
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tty_ldisc_lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tty_ldisc_lock, flags);
return ret;
}
@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ static struct tty_ldisc_ops *get_ldops(int disc)
unsigned long flags;
struct tty_ldisc_ops *ldops, *ret;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&tty_ldisc_lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&tty_ldisc_lock, flags);
ret = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
ldops = tty_ldiscs[disc];
if (ldops) {
@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ static struct tty_ldisc_ops *get_ldops(int disc)
ret = ldops;
}
}
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tty_ldisc_lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tty_ldisc_lock, flags);
return ret;
}
@@ -152,10 +152,10 @@ static void put_ldops(struct tty_ldisc_ops *ldops)
{
unsigned long flags;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&tty_ldisc_lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&tty_ldisc_lock, flags);
ldops->refcount--;
module_put(ldops->owner);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tty_ldisc_lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tty_ldisc_lock, flags);
}
/**
@@ -287,11 +287,11 @@ static struct tty_ldisc *tty_ldisc_try(struct tty_struct *tty)
unsigned long flags;
struct tty_ldisc *ld;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&tty_ldisc_lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&tty_ldisc_lock, flags);
ld = NULL;
if (test_bit(TTY_LDISC, &tty->flags))
ld = get_ldisc(tty->ldisc);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tty_ldisc_lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tty_ldisc_lock, flags);
return ld;
}
--
1.7.9.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [REPOST] tty: Use raw spin lock to protect TTY ldisc administration
2012-09-20 14:05 [PATCH] tty: Use raw spin lock to protect TTY ldisc administration Ivo Sieben
@ 2012-10-17 12:03 ` Ivo Sieben
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ivo Sieben @ 2012-10-17 12:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-serial, RT, Thomas Gleixner, Steven Rostedt
Cc: Alan Cox, Greg KH, Ivo Sieben
The global "normal" spin lock that guards the line discipline
administration is replaced by a raw spin lock. On a PREEMPT_RT system this
prevents unwanted scheduling overhead around the line discipline administration.
On a 200 MHz AT91SAM9261 processor setup this fixes about 100us of scheduling
overhead on a TTY read or write call.
Signed-off-by: Ivo Sieben <meltedpianoman@gmail.com>
---
Repost:
@Thomas Gleixner & Steven Rostedt:
I think this patch makes sense... a global spin lock causes additional
scheduling overhead. Since the critical section is small a raw spinlock
can be used here.
I tested this on a 3.0.43-rt65 kernel, with the following Kernel Hacking
options enabled:
- CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES
- CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK
- CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES
- CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
- CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
- CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK_SLEEP
drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c b/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c
index 0f2a2c5..4eb24b1 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
* callers who will do ldisc lookups and cannot sleep.
*/
-static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(tty_ldisc_lock);
+static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(tty_ldisc_lock);
static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(tty_ldisc_wait);
/* Line disc dispatch table */
static struct tty_ldisc_ops *tty_ldiscs[NR_LDISCS];
@@ -49,21 +49,21 @@ static void put_ldisc(struct tty_ldisc *ld)
* If this is the last user, free the ldisc, and
* release the ldisc ops.
*
- * We really want an "atomic_dec_and_lock_irqsave()",
+ * We really want an "atomic_dec_and_raw_lock_irqsave()",
* but we don't have it, so this does it by hand.
*/
- local_irq_save(flags);
- if (atomic_dec_and_lock(&ld->users, &tty_ldisc_lock)) {
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&tty_ldisc_lock, flags);
+ if (atomic_dec_and_test(&ld->users)) {
struct tty_ldisc_ops *ldo = ld->ops;
ldo->refcount--;
module_put(ldo->owner);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tty_ldisc_lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tty_ldisc_lock, flags);
kfree(ld);
return;
}
- local_irq_restore(flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tty_ldisc_lock, flags);
wake_up(&ld->wq_idle);
}
@@ -88,11 +88,11 @@ int tty_register_ldisc(int disc, struct tty_ldisc_ops *new_ldisc)
if (disc < N_TTY || disc >= NR_LDISCS)
return -EINVAL;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&tty_ldisc_lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&tty_ldisc_lock, flags);
tty_ldiscs[disc] = new_ldisc;
new_ldisc->num = disc;
new_ldisc->refcount = 0;
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tty_ldisc_lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tty_ldisc_lock, flags);
return ret;
}
@@ -118,12 +118,12 @@ int tty_unregister_ldisc(int disc)
if (disc < N_TTY || disc >= NR_LDISCS)
return -EINVAL;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&tty_ldisc_lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&tty_ldisc_lock, flags);
if (tty_ldiscs[disc]->refcount)
ret = -EBUSY;
else
tty_ldiscs[disc] = NULL;
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tty_ldisc_lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tty_ldisc_lock, flags);
return ret;
}
@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ static struct tty_ldisc_ops *get_ldops(int disc)
unsigned long flags;
struct tty_ldisc_ops *ldops, *ret;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&tty_ldisc_lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&tty_ldisc_lock, flags);
ret = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
ldops = tty_ldiscs[disc];
if (ldops) {
@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ static struct tty_ldisc_ops *get_ldops(int disc)
ret = ldops;
}
}
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tty_ldisc_lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tty_ldisc_lock, flags);
return ret;
}
@@ -152,10 +152,10 @@ static void put_ldops(struct tty_ldisc_ops *ldops)
{
unsigned long flags;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&tty_ldisc_lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&tty_ldisc_lock, flags);
ldops->refcount--;
module_put(ldops->owner);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tty_ldisc_lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tty_ldisc_lock, flags);
}
/**
@@ -287,11 +287,11 @@ static struct tty_ldisc *tty_ldisc_try(struct tty_struct *tty)
unsigned long flags;
struct tty_ldisc *ld;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&tty_ldisc_lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&tty_ldisc_lock, flags);
ld = NULL;
if (test_bit(TTY_LDISC, &tty->flags))
ld = get_ldisc(tty->ldisc);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tty_ldisc_lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tty_ldisc_lock, flags);
return ld;
}
--
1.7.9.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-10-17 12:03 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-09-20 14:05 [PATCH] tty: Use raw spin lock to protect TTY ldisc administration Ivo Sieben
2012-10-17 12:03 ` [REPOST] " Ivo Sieben
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).