From: Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@online.de>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] 3.6.6-rt17
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 16:49:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1356104944.4547.42.camel@marge.simpson.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1212211520570.3148@ionos>
On Fri, 2012-12-21 at 15:23 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Dec 2012, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-11-12 at 22:28 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > Dear RT Folks,
> > >
> > > I'm pleased to announce the 3.6.6-rt17 release. 3.6.6-rt16 is just a
> > > not announced update release to 3.6.6.
> > >
> > > Changes since 3.6.6-rt16:
> > >
> > > * Finally make the NOHZ softirq pending detection work with the new
> > > softirq scheme.
> >
> > Well, almost. They gripe when rebooting, but I haven't seen one other
> > than that. This is 3.6.11-rt23 on a 64 core DL980 I set up to run some
> > latency tests on.
>
> Yeah. It's not fixed completely. I know what it needs but thats major
> surgery.
>
> > [ 318.692463] kvm: exiting hardware virtualization
> > [ 319.568482] Disabling non-boot CPUs ...
> > [ 319.647819] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 80
> > [ 319.876148] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 202
> > [ 319.876172] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 202
> > [ 319.988912] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 282
> > [ 320.097066] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 202
> > [ 320.321428] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 80
> > [ 320.662601] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 202
> > [ 320.662637] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 202
> > [ 323.162636] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 202
> > [ 323.162649] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 202
> > [ 325.217675] Restarting system.
> >
> > Don't suppose you know why LAZY_PREEMPT would make 3.0-rt explode if you
> > turn on wakeup_rt tracer do you?
>
> No.
Aw poo. Tracing goop is hard.
> > I backported that and your softirq changes to 3.0. New softirq handling
> > scheme work spiffy there, LAZY_PREEMPT works fine too.. until you turn
> > tracing on, then it corrupts memory, and makes mushroom cloud.
>
> I guess you are just trying to make up for the canceled apocalypse :)
Damn. I forgot to run around yelling "The sky is falling!" :)
-Mike
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-21 15:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-12 21:28 [ANNOUNCE] 3.6.6-rt17 Thomas Gleixner
2012-11-14 19:56 ` Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
2012-11-15 14:06 ` Paul Gortmaker
2012-11-15 18:11 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-11-16 0:46 ` Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
2012-12-21 11:06 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-12-21 14:23 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-12-21 15:49 ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1356104944.4547.42.camel@marge.simpson.net \
--to=bitbucket@online.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).