public inbox for linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org,
	Carsten Emde <C.Emde@osadl.org>, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH 10/16] FIX [2/2] slub: Tid must be retrieved from the percpu area of the current processor
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 17:12:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1360771932-27150-11-git-send-email-bigeasy@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1360771932-27150-1-git-send-email-bigeasy@linutronix.de>

From: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>

As Steven Rostedt has pointer out: Rescheduling could occur on a differnet processor
after the determination of the per cpu pointer and before the tid is retrieved.
This could result in allocation from the wrong node in slab_alloc.

The effect is much more severe in slab_free() where we could free to the freelist
of the wrong page.

The window for something like that occurring is pretty small but it is possible.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
---
 mm/slub.c |   12 +++++++++---
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index 08eb4c1..78d2756 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -2286,13 +2286,18 @@ static __always_inline void *slab_alloc(struct kmem_cache *s,
 		return NULL;
 
 redo:
-
 	/*
 	 * Must read kmem_cache cpu data via this cpu ptr. Preemption is
 	 * enabled. We may switch back and forth between cpus while
 	 * reading from one cpu area. That does not matter as long
 	 * as we end up on the original cpu again when doing the cmpxchg.
+	 *
+	 * Preemption is disabled for the retrieval of the tid because that
+	 * must occur from the current processor. We cannot allow rescheduling
+	 * on a different processor between the determination of the pointer
+	 * and the retrieval of the tid.
 	 */
+	preempt_disable();
 	c = __this_cpu_ptr(s->cpu_slab);
 
 	/*
@@ -2302,7 +2307,7 @@ static __always_inline void *slab_alloc(struct kmem_cache *s,
 	 * linked list in between.
 	 */
 	tid = c->tid;
-	barrier();
+	preempt_enable();
 
 	object = c->freelist;
 	if (unlikely(!object || !node_match(c, node)))
@@ -2544,10 +2549,11 @@ static __always_inline void slab_free(struct kmem_cache *s,
 	 * data is retrieved via this pointer. If we are on the same cpu
 	 * during the cmpxchg then the free will succedd.
 	 */
+	preempt_disable();
 	c = __this_cpu_ptr(s->cpu_slab);
 
 	tid = c->tid;
-	barrier();
+	preempt_enable();
 
 	if (likely(page == c->page)) {
 		set_freepointer(s, object, c->freelist);
-- 
1.7.10.4

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-02-13 16:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-13 16:11 [PREEMPT RT] SLUB and split softirq lock for v3.2-rt Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-02-13 16:11 ` [PATCH 01/16] softirq: Make serving softirqs a task flag Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-02-13 16:11 ` [PATCH 02/16] softirq: Split handling function Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-02-13 16:11 ` [PATCH 03/16] softirq: Split softirq locks Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-02-13 16:11 ` [PATCH 04/16] rcu: rcutiny: Prevent RCU stall Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-02-16 20:59   ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-02-18 15:02     ` Steven Rostedt
2013-02-13 16:12 ` [PATCH 05/16] softirq: Adapt NOHZ softirq pending check to new RT scheme Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-02-13 16:12 ` [PATCH 06/16] softirq: Add more debugging Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-02-13 16:12 ` [PATCH 07/16] softirq: Fix nohz pending issue for real Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-02-13 16:12 ` [PATCH 08/16] net: Use local_bh_disable in netif_rx_ni() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-02-13 16:12 ` [PATCH 09/16] FIX [1/2] slub: Do not dereference NULL pointer in node_match Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-02-13 16:12 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2013-02-13 16:12 ` [PATCH 11/16] slub: Use correct cpu_slab on dead cpu Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-02-13 16:12 ` [PATCH 12/16] smp: introduce a generic on_each_cpu_mask() function Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-02-13 16:12 ` [PATCH 13/16] smp: add func to IPI cpus based on parameter func Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-02-13 16:12 ` [PATCH 14/16] slub: only IPI CPUs that have per cpu obj to flush Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-02-13 16:12 ` [PATCH 15/16] mm: Enable SLUB for RT Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-02-13 16:12 ` [PATCH 16/16] slub: Enable irqs for __GFP_WAIT Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-02-13 17:24 ` [PREEMPT RT] SLUB and split softirq lock for v3.2-rt Steven Rostedt
2013-02-13 17:41   ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-02-19  1:54   ` Li Zefan
2013-02-19  1:56     ` Li Zefan
2013-02-19  4:06       ` Steven Rostedt
2013-02-19  6:17         ` Mike Galbraith
2013-04-24  2:36 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-04-24  8:11   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-24 15:45     ` Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1360771932-27150-11-git-send-email-bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=C.Emde@osadl.org \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox