From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steven Rostedt Subject: Re: RCU?: Scheduling while atomic with 3.4.23-rt33 Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 10:32:54 -0500 Message-ID: <1361201574.23152.156.camel@gandalf.local.home> References: <4738617.pBMCEJ5E3K@dabox> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Tim Sander , linux-rt-users , LKML , "Paul E. McKenney" To: Thomas Gleixner Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-rt-users.vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2013-02-18 at 12:16 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Mon, 18 Feb 2013, Tim Sander wrote: > > Here is a transtribed backtrace for easier reading: > > c0010fac t dump_backtrace > > c022c188 T dump_stack > > c022c71c t __schedule_bug > > c022fb28 t __schedule > > c0230644 t rt_spin_lock_slowlock > > c0230ba8 T rt_spin_lock > > c003a9b8 T __wake_up > > c0052a44 t invoke_rcu_callbacks > > c0053764 T rcu_check_callbacks > > c0026060 T update_process_times > > That's due to CONFIG_TINY_PREEMPT_RCU=y. That's a known issue, which > has been fixed in 3.6-rt. > > Steven, could you backport that to 3.2/3.4 please ? > I'm currently trying to get -rt up with the latest stable releases (Greg is too damn fast). I'll add this in an -rc later today if I get a chance. Otherwise it may have to wait till next week, or perhaps I can work on it while at ELC (I leave tomorrow). Keynotes are always a good time to get tedious tasks done online. -- Steve