From: Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@online.de>
To: RT <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: rt: rtmutex experiment doubled tbench throughput
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 09:25:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1361607935.5729.8.camel@marge.simpson.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1361551010.32441.50.camel@marge.simpson.net>
With some old refuse hauled away if anybody wants to play with it.
I can't find anything that it breaks, fwtw.
---
include/linux/sched.h | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--
kernel/rtmutex.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
kernel/rtmutex_common.h | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
kernel/sched.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
kernel/sched_fair.c | 4 ++++
kernel/sched_rt.c | 3 +++
kernel/sys.c | 1 +
kernel/sysctl.c | 11 +++++++++++
8 files changed, 143 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -2146,12 +2146,35 @@ extern unsigned int sysctl_sched_cfs_ban
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_RT_MUTEXES
-extern void task_setprio(struct task_struct *p, int prio);
+#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL
+extern unsigned int sysctl_sched_rt_spin_yield;
+
+static inline bool rt_spin_yield_enabled(void)
+{
+ return sysctl_sched_rt_spin_yield;
+}
+
+static inline void rt_spin_yield_disable(void)
+{
+ sysctl_sched_rt_spin_yield = 0;
+}
+#else
+static inline bool rt_spin_yield_enabled(void)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+static inline void rt_spin_yield_disable(void) { }
+#endif
+extern void task_setprio(struct task_struct *p, int prio, int requeue);
extern int rt_mutex_getprio(struct task_struct *p);
extern int rt_mutex_check_prio(struct task_struct *task, int newprio);
static inline void rt_mutex_setprio(struct task_struct *p, int prio)
{
- task_setprio(p, prio);
+ task_setprio(p, prio, 0);
+}
+static inline void rt_mutex_requeue(struct task_struct *p, int prio)
+{
+ task_setprio(p, prio, 1);
}
extern void rt_mutex_adjust_pi(struct task_struct *p);
static inline bool tsk_is_pi_blocked(struct task_struct *tsk)
--- a/kernel/rtmutex.c
+++ b/kernel/rtmutex.c
@@ -702,8 +702,8 @@ static int adaptive_wait(struct rt_mutex
* checking the above to be valid.
*/
barrier();
- if (!owner->on_cpu) {
- res = 1;
+ if (!owner || !owner->on_cpu) {
+ res = owner && !owner->on_cpu;
break;
}
cpu_relax();
@@ -733,7 +733,7 @@ static void noinline __sched rt_spin_lo
{
struct task_struct *lock_owner, *self = current;
struct rt_mutex_waiter waiter, *top_waiter;
- int ret;
+ int ret, wait, rt_spin = 0, other_spin = 0, cpu;
rt_mutex_init_waiter(&waiter, true);
@@ -761,6 +761,17 @@ static void noinline __sched rt_spin_lo
ret = task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(lock, &waiter, self, 0);
BUG_ON(ret);
+ /* basic spin/yield sanity checks */
+ if (rt_spin_yield_enabled()) {
+ rt_spin = !self->saved_state;
+ /* Here there be dragons */
+ rt_spin &= !(self->flags & PF_EXITING);
+ other_spin = rt_spin;
+ rt_spin &= rt_task(self);
+ other_spin &= !rt_spin;
+ }
+ cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
+
for (;;) {
/* Try to acquire the lock again. */
if (__try_to_take_rt_mutex(lock, self, &waiter, STEAL_LATERAL))
@@ -769,12 +780,25 @@ static void noinline __sched rt_spin_lo
top_waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock);
lock_owner = rt_mutex_owner(lock);
+ if (rt_spin)
+ wait = 1;
+ else
+ wait = top_waiter != &waiter;
+
+ /* SCHED_OTHER can laterally steal, let them try */
+ if (other_spin) {
+ wait &= task_cpu(top_waiter->task) == cpu;
+ wait |= top_waiter->task->prio < self->prio;
+ wait |= lock_owner && !lock_owner->on_cpu;
+ wait |= lock_owner && !lock_owner->prio < self->prio;
+ }
+
raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
debug_rt_mutex_print_deadlock(&waiter);
- if (top_waiter != &waiter || adaptive_wait(lock, lock_owner))
- schedule_rt_mutex(lock);
+ if (wait || adaptive_wait(lock, lock_owner))
+ schedule_rt_spinlock(lock, rt_spin);
raw_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock);
@@ -826,6 +850,16 @@ static void noinline __sched rt_spin_lo
return;
}
+ if (rt_spin_yield_enabled() && rt_task(current)) {
+ struct rt_mutex_waiter *top_waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock);
+ struct task_struct *next = top_waiter->task;
+
+ /* Move next in line to head of its queue */
+ pi_lock(&next->pi_lock);
+ rt_mutex_requeue(next, next->prio);
+ pi_unlock(&next->pi_lock);
+ }
+
wakeup_next_waiter(lock);
raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
--- a/kernel/rtmutex_common.h
+++ b/kernel/rtmutex_common.h
@@ -32,9 +32,37 @@ extern void schedule_rt_mutex_test(struc
schedule_rt_mutex_test(_lock); \
} while (0)
-#else
-# define schedule_rt_mutex(_lock) schedule()
-#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL
+#define schedule_rt_spinlock(_lock, _spin) \
+ do { \
+ if (!(current->flags & PF_MUTEX_TESTER)) { \
+ if (!_spin) \
+ schedule(); \
+ else \
+ yield(); \
+ } else \
+ schedule_rt_mutex_test(_lock); \
+ } while (0)
+#else /* !CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL */
+#define schedule_rt_spinlock(_lock, _spin) schedule_rt_mutex(_lock)
+#endif /* CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL */
+
+#else /* !CONFIG_RT_MUTEX_TESTER */
+
+#define schedule_rt_mutex(_lock) schedule()
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL
+#define schedule_rt_spinlock(_lock, _spin) \
+ do { \
+ if (!_spin) \
+ schedule(); \
+ else \
+ yield(); \
+ } while (0)
+#else /* !CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL */
+#define schedule_rt_spinlock(_lock, _spin) schedule_rt_mutex(_lock)
+#endif /* CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL */
+#endif /* CONFIG_RT_MUTEX_TESTER */
/*
* This is the control structure for tasks blocked on a rt_mutex,
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -943,6 +943,12 @@ late_initcall(sched_init_debug);
const_debug unsigned int sysctl_sched_nr_migrate = 32;
#else
const_debug unsigned int sysctl_sched_nr_migrate = 8;
+
+/*
+ * rt spinlock waiters yield() if necessary vs blocking.
+ * SCHED_OTHER must block, but spin if they can do so.
+ */
+unsigned int sysctl_sched_rt_spin_yield __read_mostly;
#endif
/*
@@ -5292,6 +5298,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(sleep_on_timeout);
* task_setprio - set the current priority of a task
* @p: task
* @prio: prio value (kernel-internal form)
+ * @requeue: requeue an rt_spin_lock_slowlock() top waiter and preempt
*
* This function changes the 'effective' priority of a task. It does
* not touch ->normal_prio like __setscheduler().
@@ -5299,7 +5306,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(sleep_on_timeout);
* Used by the rt_mutex code to implement priority inheritance
* logic. Call site only calls if the priority of the task changed.
*/
-void task_setprio(struct task_struct *p, int prio)
+void task_setprio(struct task_struct *p, int prio, int requeue)
{
int oldprio, on_rq, running;
struct rq *rq;
@@ -5332,6 +5339,8 @@ void task_setprio(struct task_struct *p,
prev_class = p->sched_class;
on_rq = p->on_rq;
running = task_current(rq, p);
+ if (requeue && (running || !on_rq || !rt_prio(oldprio)))
+ goto out_unlock;
if (on_rq)
dequeue_task(rq, p, 0);
if (running)
@@ -5346,8 +5355,25 @@ void task_setprio(struct task_struct *p,
if (running)
p->sched_class->set_curr_task(rq);
- if (on_rq)
- enqueue_task(rq, p, oldprio < prio ? ENQUEUE_HEAD : 0);
+ if (on_rq) {
+ if (!sysctl_sched_rt_spin_yield) {
+ enqueue_task(rq, p, oldprio < prio ? ENQUEUE_HEAD : 0);
+ } else {
+ enqueue_task(rq, p, ENQUEUE_HEAD);
+
+ /*
+ * If we're requeueing a spinlock waiter, preempt any
+ * peer in the way, waiter involuntarily blocked, so
+ * has the right to use this CPU before its peers.
+ */
+ requeue &= p->prio <= rq->curr->prio;
+ requeue &= rq->curr->state == TASK_RUNNING;
+ requeue &= rq->curr != current;
+
+ if (requeue)
+ resched_task(rq->curr);
+ }
+ }
check_class_changed(rq, p, prev_class, oldprio);
out_unlock:
--- a/kernel/sched_fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_fair.c
@@ -2510,6 +2510,10 @@ static void check_preempt_wakeup(struct
if (unlikely(se == pse))
return;
+ /* FIXME: might be spinning on a lock, good enough to play with */
+ if (rt_spin_yield_enabled() && curr->migrate_disable)
+ return;
+
/*
* This is possible from callers such as pull_task(), in which we
* unconditionally check_prempt_curr() after an enqueue (which may have
--- a/kernel/sched_rt.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_rt.c
@@ -991,6 +991,9 @@ enqueue_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct ta
if (flags & ENQUEUE_WAKEUP)
rt_se->timeout = 0;
+ if (rt_spin_yield_enabled() && (flags & WF_LOCK_SLEEPER))
+ flags |= ENQUEUE_HEAD;
+
enqueue_rt_entity(rt_se, flags & ENQUEUE_HEAD);
if (!task_current(rq, p) && p->rt.nr_cpus_allowed > 1)
--- a/kernel/sys.c
+++ b/kernel/sys.c
@@ -316,6 +316,7 @@ void kernel_restart_prepare(char *cmd)
{
blocking_notifier_call_chain(&reboot_notifier_list, SYS_RESTART, cmd);
system_state = SYSTEM_RESTART;
+ rt_spin_yield_disable();
usermodehelper_disable();
device_shutdown();
syscore_shutdown();
--- a/kernel/sysctl.c
+++ b/kernel/sysctl.c
@@ -368,6 +368,17 @@ static struct ctl_table kern_table[] = {
.mode = 0644,
.proc_handler = sched_rt_handler,
},
+#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL
+ {
+ .procname = "sched_rt_spin_yield",
+ .data = &sysctl_sched_rt_spin_yield,
+ .maxlen = sizeof(unsigned int),
+ .mode = 0644,
+ .proc_handler = proc_dointvec_minmax,
+ .extra1 = &zero,
+ .extra2 = &one,
+ },
+#endif
{
.procname = "sched_compat_yield",
.data = &sysctl_sched_compat_yield,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-23 8:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-22 16:36 rt: rtmutex experiment doubled tbench throughput Mike Galbraith
2013-02-23 8:25 ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2013-02-26 19:45 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-02-27 4:19 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-02-28 5:59 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-02-26 21:25 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-02-27 2:22 ` Paul Gortmaker
2013-02-27 2:32 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-02-27 2:35 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-02-27 2:52 ` Paul Gortmaker
2013-02-27 4:55 ` Mike Galbraith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1361607935.5729.8.camel@marge.simpson.net \
--to=bitbucket@online.de \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox