From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Galbraith Subject: Re: nouveau + rt = boom Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 08:34:14 +0200 Message-ID: <1401777254.6214.107.camel@marge.simpson.net> References: <1401714764.5757.3.camel@marge.simpson.net> <1401715040.5757.7.camel@marge.simpson.net> <538C79E6.4070306@linutronix.de> <1401715317.5757.10.camel@marge.simpson.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-rt-users , LKML , Thomas Gleixner , Steven Rostedt To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1401715317.5757.10.camel@marge.simpson.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-rt-users.vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2014-06-02 at 15:21 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Mon, 2014-06-02 at 15:19 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > On 06/02/2014 03:17 PM, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > TODO++: Rummage around in this nouveau -rt explosion. > > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/7/163 > > Aha, thanks. I hit instability in a SLE nopreempt kernel yesterday with the thing too, one of the events being an fs BUG() that just happened to occur immediately after my display went gaga. Playing with nouveau in box I need for daily bread could be a bad idea. (chicken) TODO-- -Mike