From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Galbraith Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] 3.4.10-rt7 Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2014 16:54:49 +0200 Message-ID: <1404744889.4709.83.camel@marge.simpson.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: LKML , linux-rt-users , Steven Rostedt , Sebastian Sewior , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , "Paul E. McKenney" , Carsten Emde To: Thomas Gleixner Return-path: Received: from mail-wg0-f45.google.com ([74.125.82.45]:65036 "EHLO mail-wg0-f45.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751591AbaGGOyz (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jul 2014 10:54:55 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 14:47 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Dear RT Folks, > > I'm pleased to announce the 3.14.10-rt7 release. 3.14.10-rt6 is a not > announced update to 3.14.10 without any RT changes aside of resolving > the patch conflicts. > > Changes since 3.14.10-rt6: > > * Do not clear PF_NO_SETAFFINITY flag in select_fallback_rq() - > from Steven > > * Prevent workqueue deadlock/stall observed with XFS > > > A few words on the status and the future of RT: > ----------------------------------------------- > > The situation since last years RTLWS (https://lwn.net/Articles/572740/) > has not improved at all, it's worse than before. > > While shortly after RTLWS quite some people promised to whip up proper > funding, nothing has materialized and my personal situation is worse > than before. Sorry to hear that funding hasn't as yet happened. > I'm really tired of all the politics involved, the blantant lies and > the marketing bullshit which I have to bear. I learned a few month ago > that a certain kernel vendor invented most of RT anyway and is the > expert in this field, so the customers dont have to worry about my > statements. Wow, so someone thinks their customers either can't or won't read. That kind of marketing can backfire in a big way. -Mike