From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexey Brodkin Subject: Re: [PATCH] Makefile: allow building selected tests with non-NPTL toolchain Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 07:35:01 +0000 Message-ID: <1421307300.3008.2.camel@synopsys.com> References: <1415603814-7682-1-git-send-email-abrodkin@synopsys.com> Reply-To: Alexey Brodkin Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org" , "Vineet Gupta" To: "clark.williams@gmail.com" , "jkacur@redhat.com" Return-path: Received: from smtprelay2.synopsys.com ([198.182.60.111]:53801 "EHLO smtprelay.synopsys.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751183AbbAOHfH convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jan 2015 02:35:07 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1415603814-7682-1-git-send-email-abrodkin@synopsys.com> Content-Language: en-US Content-ID: Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Clark, John, On Mon, 2014-11-10 at 10:16 +0300, Alexey Brodkin wrote: > Some architectures are still stuck with non-NPTL toolchains. > These are for example ARC, Blackfin, Xtensa etc. > > Still rt-tests are very good benchmarks and it would be good to enable use of > at least selected (those that will be built) tests on those architectures. > > This change makes it possible to only build subset of tests that don't require > NPTL calls. > > By default behavior is not modified - all tests are built, but if one wants > to build with non-NPTL toolchain just add "HAVE_NPTL=no" in command line > or modify "HAVE_NPTL" variable right in Makefile and execute "make". > > Signed-off-by: Alexey Brodkin > Cc: Vineet Gupta > Cc: Clark Williams > --- > Makefile | 11 ++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile > index 318a5c6..675edf7 100644 > --- a/Makefile > +++ b/Makefile > @@ -1,8 +1,13 @@ > VERSION_STRING = 0.89 > > -sources = cyclictest.c signaltest.c pi_stress.c rt-migrate-test.c \ > - ptsematest.c sigwaittest.c svsematest.c pmqtest.c sendme.c \ > - pip_stress.c hackbench.c > +HAVE_NPTL ?= yes > + > +ifeq ($(HAVE_NPTL),yes) > +sources = cyclictest.c pi_stress.c pip_stress.c pmqtest.c rt-migrate-test.c > +endif > + > +sources += signaltest.c ptsematest.c sigwaittest.c svsematest.c sendme.c \ > + hackbench.c > > TARGETS = $(sources:.c=) I'm wondering if there's a chance to get this patch reviewed and if there're no objections applied? Regards, Alexey