linux-rt-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	RT <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RT 3.18] irq_work: Provide a soft-irq based queue
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 09:19:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1429773566.3419.42.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55389B67.3000703@siemens.com>

On Thu, 2015-04-23 at 09:12 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2015-04-23 09:01, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-04-23 at 08:50 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > > On 2015-04-23 08:11, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > > @@ -103,6 +98,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(irq_work_queue_on);
> > > >  /* Enqueue the irq work @work on the current CPU */
> > > >  bool irq_work_queue(struct irq_work *work)
> > > >  {
> > > > +       bool realtime = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL);
> > > > +       bool raise = false;
> > > > +
> > > >         /* Only queue if not already pending */
> > > >         if (!irq_work_claim(work))
> > > >                 return false;
> > > > @@ -110,25 +108,22 @@ bool irq_work_queue(struct irq_work *wor
> > > >         /* Queue the entry and raise the IPI if needed. */
> > > >         preempt_disable();
> > > >  
> > > > -#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL
> > > > -       if (work->flags & IRQ_WORK_HARD_IRQ) {
> > > > +       if (realtime && (work->flags & IRQ_WORK_HARD_IRQ)) {
> > > >                 if (llist_add(&work->llnode, 
> > > > this_cpu_ptr(&hirq_work_list)))
> > > 
> > > This boils down to
> > > 
> > > #ifdef CONFIG_X
> > > some_type x;
> > > #endif
> > > ...
> > > 
> > > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X) && ...)
> > >       use(x);
> > > 
> > > And here we even have an indirection for IS_ENABLED via that 
> > > local 
> > > bool
> > > variable. Is that pattern OK for Linux? Does it compile in all 
> > > supported
> > > optimization levels of all supported compilers?
> > 
> > I hope it all goes away, that being what IS_ENABLED() is there for.
> 
> Hope is good - but not enough here: it breaks the build under
> !CONFIG_X, even the case without the bool var.
> 
>   CC      kernel/irq_work.o
> In file included from ../include/asm-generic/percpu.h:6:0,
>                  from ../arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h:522,
>                  from ../arch/x86/include/asm/current.h:5,
>                  from ../arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h:15,
>                  from ../arch/x86/include/asm/irq_work.h:4,
>                  from ../include/linux/irq_work.h:47,
>                  from ../kernel/irq_work.c:11:
> ../kernel/irq_work.c: In function ‘irq_work_queue_on’:
> ../kernel/irq_work.c:85:17: error: ‘hirq_work_list’ undeclared 
> (first use in this function)
>         &per_cpu(hirq_work_list, cpu));

Aw poo, so that's just what I _thought_ it was for.

        -Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2015-04-23  7:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-16 14:06 [PATCH RT 3.18] ring-buffer: Mark irq_work as HARD_IRQ to prevent deadlocks Jan Kiszka
2015-04-16 14:12 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-04-16 14:26 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-04-16 14:28   ` Jan Kiszka
2015-04-16 14:57     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-04-16 15:31       ` Jan Kiszka
2015-04-16 15:10     ` Steven Rostedt
2015-04-16 15:29       ` Jan Kiszka
2015-04-16 15:33         ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-04-16 16:28         ` [PATCH RT 3.18] irq_work: Provide a soft-irq based queue Jan Kiszka
2015-04-20  8:03           ` Mike Galbraith
2015-04-23  6:11             ` Mike Galbraith
2015-04-23  6:29               ` Jan Kiszka
2015-04-23  6:58                 ` Mike Galbraith
2015-04-23  7:14                   ` Jan Kiszka
2015-04-23  6:50               ` Jan Kiszka
2015-04-23  7:01                 ` Mike Galbraith
2015-04-23  7:12                   ` Jan Kiszka
2015-04-23  7:19                     ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2015-04-23 21:00                       ` Steven Rostedt
2015-04-24  6:54                         ` Mike Galbraith
2015-04-24  9:00                           ` Jan Kiszka
2015-04-24  9:59                             ` Mike Galbraith
2015-04-25  7:20                             ` Mike Galbraith
2015-04-25  7:26                               ` Jan Kiszka
2015-05-18 19:52                                 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1429773566.3419.42.camel@gmail.com \
    --to=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).