From: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org>
To: rostedt@goodmis.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
will.deacon@arm.com, bigeasy@linutronix.de
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, yang.shi@linaro.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: replace read_lock to rcu lock in call_step_hook
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 14:49:24 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1454971764-30720-1-git-send-email-yang.shi@linaro.org> (raw)
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:917
in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 128, pid: 383, name: sh
Preemption disabled at:[<ffff800000124c18>] kgdb_cpu_enter+0x158/0x6b8
CPU: 3 PID: 383 Comm: sh Tainted: G W 4.1.13-rt13 #2
Hardware name: Freescale Layerscape 2085a RDB Board (DT)
Call trace:
[<ffff8000000885e8>] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x128
[<ffff800000088734>] show_stack+0x24/0x30
[<ffff80000079a7c4>] dump_stack+0x80/0xa0
[<ffff8000000bd324>] ___might_sleep+0x18c/0x1a0
[<ffff8000007a20ac>] __rt_spin_lock+0x2c/0x40
[<ffff8000007a2268>] rt_read_lock+0x40/0x58
[<ffff800000085328>] single_step_handler+0x38/0xd8
[<ffff800000082368>] do_debug_exception+0x58/0xb8
Exception stack(0xffff80834a1e7c80 to 0xffff80834a1e7da0)
7c80: ffffff9c ffffffff 92c23ba0 0000ffff 4a1e7e40 ffff8083 001bfcc4 ffff8000
7ca0: f2000400 00000000 00000000 00000000 4a1e7d80 ffff8083 0049501c ffff8000
7cc0: 00005402 00000000 00aaa210 ffff8000 4a1e7ea0 ffff8083 000833f4 ffff8000
7ce0: ffffff9c ffffffff 92c23ba0 0000ffff 4a1e7ea0 ffff8083 001bfcc0 ffff8000
7d00: 4a0fc400 ffff8083 00005402 00000000 4a1e7d40 ffff8083 00490324 ffff8000
7d20: ffffff9c 00000000 92c23ba0 0000ffff 000a0000 00000000 00000000 00000000
7d40: 00000008 00000000 00080000 00000000 92c23b8b 0000ffff 92c23b8e 0000ffff
7d60: 00000038 00000000 00001cb2 00000000 00000005 00000000 92d7b498 0000ffff
7d80: 01010101 01010101 92be9000 0000ffff 00000000 00000000 00000030 00000000
[<ffff8000000833f4>] el1_dbg+0x18/0x6c
This issue is similar with 62c6c61("arm64: replace read_lock to rcu lock in
call_break_hook"), but comes to single_step_handler.
This also solves kgdbts boot test silent hang issue on 4.4 -rt kernel.
Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org>
---
arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c | 21 +++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c
index 8aee3ae..c1492ba 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c
@@ -186,20 +186,21 @@ static void clear_regs_spsr_ss(struct pt_regs *regs)
/* EL1 Single Step Handler hooks */
static LIST_HEAD(step_hook);
-static DEFINE_RWLOCK(step_hook_lock);
+static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(step_hook_lock);
void register_step_hook(struct step_hook *hook)
{
- write_lock(&step_hook_lock);
- list_add(&hook->node, &step_hook);
- write_unlock(&step_hook_lock);
+ spin_lock(&step_hook_lock);
+ list_add_rcu(&hook->node, &step_hook);
+ spin_unlock(&step_hook_lock);
}
void unregister_step_hook(struct step_hook *hook)
{
- write_lock(&step_hook_lock);
- list_del(&hook->node);
- write_unlock(&step_hook_lock);
+ spin_lock(&step_hook_lock);
+ list_del_rcu(&hook->node);
+ spin_unlock(&step_hook_lock);
+ synchronize_rcu();
}
/*
@@ -213,15 +214,15 @@ static int call_step_hook(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int esr)
struct step_hook *hook;
int retval = DBG_HOOK_ERROR;
- read_lock(&step_hook_lock);
+ rcu_read_lock();
- list_for_each_entry(hook, &step_hook, node) {
+ list_for_each_entry_rcu(hook, &step_hook, node) {
retval = hook->fn(regs, esr);
if (retval == DBG_HOOK_HANDLED)
break;
}
- read_unlock(&step_hook_lock);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
return retval;
}
--
2.0.2
next reply other threads:[~2016-02-08 22:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-08 22:49 Yang Shi [this message]
2016-02-09 9:02 ` [PATCH] arm64: replace read_lock to rcu lock in call_step_hook Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2016-02-09 14:54 ` Will Deacon
2016-02-09 15:07 ` Steven Rostedt
2016-02-09 16:04 ` Will Deacon
2016-02-09 16:08 ` Steven Rostedt
2016-02-09 16:24 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1454971764-30720-1-git-send-email-yang.shi@linaro.org \
--to=yang.shi@linaro.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).