linux-rt-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2 0/4] cyclictest: improve running under trace-cmd
@ 2016-03-17 18:30 Luiz Capitulino
  2016-03-17 18:30 ` [PATCH 1/4] cyclictest: tracing(): check for notrace Luiz Capitulino
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Luiz Capitulino @ 2016-03-17 18:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-rt-users; +Cc: jkacur, williams


In short, this series allows you to run cyclictest under
trace-cmd and still get trace marks when the latency
specified with -b is execeded. More details in patch 4/4.

o v2

 - rebase against current master

Luiz Capitulino (4):
  cyclictest: tracing(): check for notrace
  cyclictest: move debugfs init code to its own function
  cyclictest: move tracemark_fd handling to its own function
  cyclictest: add --tracemark option

 src/cyclictest/cyclictest.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

-- 
2.1.0

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 0/4] cyclictest: improve running under trace-cmd
@ 2016-02-25 16:29 Luiz Capitulino
  2016-02-25 16:29 ` [PATCH 3/4] cyclictest: move tracemark_fd handling to its own function Luiz Capitulino
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Luiz Capitulino @ 2016-02-25 16:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-rt-users; +Cc: jkacur, williams


This is just a repost of my RFC posting with no changes.
I have tested it a bit more and I think it's good
for inclusion.

Original intro:

In short, this series allows you to run cyclictest under
trace-cmd and still get trace marks when the latency
specified with -b is execeded. More details in patch 4/4.

This series is RFC because I'm not completely sure this
is the right thing to do. I'm wondering if we shouldn't
ditch all tracing support from cyclictest...

Luiz Capitulino (4):
  cyclictest: tracing(): check for notrace
  cyclictest: move debugfs init code to its own function
  cyclictest: move tracemark_fd handling to its own function
  cyclictest: add --tracemark option

 src/cyclictest/cyclictest.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

-- 
2.1.0

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2016-03-22 15:01 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-03-17 18:30 [PATCH v2 0/4] cyclictest: improve running under trace-cmd Luiz Capitulino
2016-03-17 18:30 ` [PATCH 1/4] cyclictest: tracing(): check for notrace Luiz Capitulino
2016-03-22 14:37   ` John Kacur
2016-03-17 18:30 ` [PATCH 2/4] cyclictest: move debugfs init code to its own function Luiz Capitulino
2016-03-22 14:40   ` John Kacur
2016-03-17 18:30 ` [PATCH 3/4] cyclictest: move tracemark_fd handling " Luiz Capitulino
2016-03-22 14:35   ` John Kacur
2016-03-22 14:42     ` Luiz Capitulino
2016-03-17 18:30 ` [PATCH 4/4] cyclictest: add --tracemark option Luiz Capitulino
2016-03-22 14:57   ` John Kacur
2016-03-22 15:01     ` Luiz Capitulino
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-02-25 16:29 [PATCH 0/4] cyclictest: improve running under trace-cmd Luiz Capitulino
2016-02-25 16:29 ` [PATCH 3/4] cyclictest: move tracemark_fd handling to its own function Luiz Capitulino

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).