From: "Patel, Vedang" <vedang.patel@intel.com>
To: "linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org" <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "Hart, Darren" <darren.hart@intel.com>
Subject: Regression on rt kernel while using POSIX timers
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 18:41:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1486579285.29816.105.camel@intel.com> (raw)
Hi,
I am trying to reproduce results in the Expected Results section on htt
ps://rt.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Cyclictest
The results for the POSIX timers were not as I expected. The latency
for real-time kernel (v4.9.4-rt2) was worse compared to the mainline
kernel (v4.9.4). In almost all the cases, the latency is almost doubled
with the max value reaching about 10 times when performing the tests
under load.
I was using a system with Intel® Atom processor C2758 and running the
following commands with no load and 100% load:
* cyclictest -t1 -p 80 -i 10000 -l 10000
* cyclictest -t1 -p 80 -i 500 -l 100000
I was using hackbench for generating the loads as follows:
./hackbench -p -s 100 -l 10000 -f 100 -P &
Does anyone have know of any known bugs which might be causing this
regression?
Thanks,
Vedang Patel
Software Engineer
Intel Corporation
next reply other threads:[~2017-02-08 18:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-08 18:41 Patel, Vedang [this message]
2017-02-10 19:07 ` Regression on rt kernel while using POSIX timers Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2017-02-13 18:48 ` Patel, Vedang
2017-02-15 16:54 ` bigeasy
2017-02-16 2:05 ` Julia Cartwright
2017-02-16 2:34 ` Patel, Vedang
2017-02-22 1:43 ` Patel, Vedang
2017-03-01 15:22 ` bigeasy
2017-03-01 19:03 ` Tracy Smith
2017-03-02 3:23 ` Patel, Vedang
2017-03-03 19:41 ` Julia Cartwright
2017-03-03 20:32 ` Julia Cartwright
2017-03-03 21:09 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-03-03 23:36 ` Patel, Vedang
2017-03-06 11:29 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-03-07 2:01 ` Patel, Vedang
2017-03-07 17:03 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-03-20 22:54 ` Patel, Vedang
2017-03-03 16:51 ` Thomas Gleixner
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-02-13 20:32 Ran Shalit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1486579285.29816.105.camel@intel.com \
--to=vedang.patel@intel.com \
--cc=darren.hart@intel.com \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).