From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] v4.11.5-rt1
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 12:14:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1497867291.19618.52.camel@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170619085206.n2n22lpdfsoqbp5m@linutronix.de>
On Mon, 2017-06-19 at 10:52 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2017-06-17 10:14:37 [+0200], Mike Galbraith wrote:
>
> > During that rebase, migrate_disable() was changed to no longer map to
> > preempt_disable() for nonrt, but some patches still assume it does. It
> > now depends upon PREEMPT_COUNT, the RT workaround in futex.c induces
> > grumbling in nonrt builds with PREEMPT_COUNT enabled.
>
> argh, right. It was planned to get it merged upstream but due to
> $reasons we never got that far. For that reason I would simply revert
> that change and let migrate_disable() map to preempt_disable() as it did
> earlier.
Ok, doesn't matter for RT testing. What does matter, is that...
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 30b24f774198..10e832da70b6 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -2284,7 +2284,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(wake_up_process);
*/
int wake_up_lock_sleeper(struct task_struct *p)
{
- return try_to_wake_up(p, TASK_ALL, WF_LOCK_SLEEPER);
+ return try_to_wake_up(p, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, WF_LOCK_SLEEPER);
}
...appears to be inducing lost futex wakeups.
Scratch that "appears", changing it to TASK_NORMAL just fixed my DL980
running otherwise absolutely pristine 4.9-rt21, after having double
verified that rt20 works fine. Now to go back to 4.11/master/tip-rt,
make sure that the little bugger really really REALLY ain't fscking
with me for the sheer fun of it, futexes being made of pure evil :)
My testcase is to run futex_wait -n 4 in a modest sized loop. Odd
thing is that it only reproduces on the DL980 if I let it use multiple
sockets, pin it to one, and all is peachy, (rather seems to be given)
whereas on desktop box, the hang is far more intermittent, but there.
-Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-19 10:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-16 10:56 [ANNOUNCE] v4.11.5-rt1 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2017-06-17 8:14 ` Mike Galbraith
2017-06-18 6:46 ` Mike Galbraith
2017-06-19 8:52 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2017-06-19 10:14 ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2017-06-19 10:44 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2017-06-19 11:31 ` Mike Galbraith
2017-06-19 11:50 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2017-06-19 12:55 ` Mike Galbraith
2017-06-19 14:06 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2017-06-19 14:36 ` Mike Galbraith
2017-06-19 15:03 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2017-06-19 16:14 ` Mike Galbraith
2017-06-19 16:27 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2017-06-19 16:46 ` Mike Galbraith
2017-06-19 14:08 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-06-19 14:13 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2017-06-19 14:41 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-06-19 16:29 ` Mike Galbraith
2017-06-20 7:45 ` Mike Galbraith
2017-06-22 16:34 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2017-06-22 17:30 ` Mike Galbraith
2017-06-22 21:36 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-06-23 2:00 ` Mike Galbraith
2017-06-23 12:48 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2017-06-18 17:01 ` [patch-rt] rtmutex: Fix lock stealing logic Mike Galbraith
2017-06-23 7:37 ` [patch-rt v2] " Mike Galbraith
2017-06-23 10:07 ` Mike Galbraith
2017-06-26 13:47 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2017-06-23 13:33 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-06-23 14:07 ` Mike Galbraith
2017-06-23 14:14 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1497867291.19618.52.camel@gmx.de \
--to=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).