linux-rt-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] v4.11.5-rt1
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 12:14:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1497867291.19618.52.camel@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170619085206.n2n22lpdfsoqbp5m@linutronix.de>

On Mon, 2017-06-19 at 10:52 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2017-06-17 10:14:37 [+0200], Mike Galbraith wrote:
> 
> > During that rebase, migrate_disable() was changed to no longer map to
> > preempt_disable() for nonrt, but some patches still assume it does.  It
> > now depends upon PREEMPT_COUNT, the RT workaround in futex.c induces
> > grumbling in nonrt builds with PREEMPT_COUNT enabled.
> 
> argh, right. It was planned to get it merged upstream but due to
> $reasons we never got that far. For that reason I would simply revert
> that change and let migrate_disable() map to preempt_disable() as it did
> earlier.

Ok, doesn't matter for RT testing.  What does matter, is that...

diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 30b24f774198..10e832da70b6 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -2284,7 +2284,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(wake_up_process);
  */
 int wake_up_lock_sleeper(struct task_struct *p)
 {
-       return try_to_wake_up(p, TASK_ALL, WF_LOCK_SLEEPER);
+       return try_to_wake_up(p, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, WF_LOCK_SLEEPER);
 }

...appears to be inducing lost futex wakeups.

Scratch that "appears", changing it to TASK_NORMAL just fixed my DL980
running otherwise absolutely pristine 4.9-rt21, after having double
verified that rt20 works fine.  Now to go back to 4.11/master/tip-rt,
make sure that the little bugger really really REALLY ain't fscking
with me for the sheer fun of it, futexes being made of pure evil :)

My testcase is to run futex_wait -n 4 in a modest sized loop.  Odd
thing is that it only reproduces on the DL980 if I let it use multiple
sockets, pin it to one, and all is peachy, (rather seems to be given)
whereas on desktop box, the hang is far more intermittent, but there.

	-Mike

  reply	other threads:[~2017-06-19 10:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-16 10:56 [ANNOUNCE] v4.11.5-rt1 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2017-06-17  8:14 ` Mike Galbraith
2017-06-18  6:46   ` Mike Galbraith
2017-06-19  8:52   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2017-06-19 10:14     ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2017-06-19 10:44       ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2017-06-19 11:31         ` Mike Galbraith
2017-06-19 11:50           ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2017-06-19 12:55             ` Mike Galbraith
2017-06-19 14:06               ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2017-06-19 14:36                 ` Mike Galbraith
2017-06-19 15:03                   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2017-06-19 16:14                     ` Mike Galbraith
2017-06-19 16:27                       ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2017-06-19 16:46                         ` Mike Galbraith
2017-06-19 14:08       ` Steven Rostedt
2017-06-19 14:13         ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2017-06-19 14:41           ` Steven Rostedt
2017-06-19 16:29             ` Mike Galbraith
2017-06-20  7:45               ` Mike Galbraith
2017-06-22 16:34                 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2017-06-22 17:30                   ` Mike Galbraith
2017-06-22 21:36                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-06-23  2:00                     ` Mike Galbraith
2017-06-23 12:48                     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2017-06-18 17:01 ` [patch-rt] rtmutex: Fix lock stealing logic Mike Galbraith
2017-06-23  7:37   ` [patch-rt v2] " Mike Galbraith
2017-06-23 10:07     ` Mike Galbraith
2017-06-26 13:47       ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2017-06-23 13:33     ` Steven Rostedt
2017-06-23 14:07       ` Mike Galbraith
2017-06-23 14:14         ` Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1497867291.19618.52.camel@gmx.de \
    --to=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).