From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tom Zanussi Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/40] tracing: Inter-event (e.g. latency) support Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 16:11:25 -0500 Message-ID: <1506028285.24518.3.camel@tzanussi-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com> References: <20170919123113.499b59b1@gandalf.local.home> <1505846668.29775.13.camel@tzanussi-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com> <20170921162027.1eb0d8c7@gandalf.local.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mhiramat@kernel.org, namhyung@kernel.org, vedang.patel@intel.com, bigeasy@linutronix.de, joel.opensrc@gmail.com, joelaf@google.com, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, baohong.liu@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org To: Steven Rostedt Return-path: Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:16447 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751741AbdIUVL4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Sep 2017 17:11:56 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20170921162027.1eb0d8c7@gandalf.local.home> Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Steve, On Thu, 2017-09-21 at 16:20 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Tue, 19 Sep 2017 13:44:28 -0500 > Tom Zanussi wrote: > > > Yeah, it's almost ready. At this point, I've addressed all the comments > > except for: > > > > - PATCH v2 25/40] tracing: Add support for dynamic tracepoints > > > > which I need to do a little bit of research on to figure out what > > exactly I need to do there. > > Let me know if you need any help. > OK, thanks. > > > > I was also kind of looking for a couple patches from you to fold in > > which you had mentioned you were going to send for: > > > > - [PATCH v2 35/40] tracing: Reverse the order event_mutex/trace_types_lock are taken > > OK, I have a stand alone patch that you don't need to fold in that does > this properly. I tested the crap out of it (missed a few places), but > should be good. I'll send that netx. > > > > - [PATCH v2 40/40] tracing: Add trace_event_buffer_reserve() variant that allows recursion > > I have this working too, but want to test it a little more before > sending. Once I do, you can add both patches ahead of your series. I > may just apply them to my tree now and start running them through my > formal tests. > Thanks for these patches - testing now with the mutex patch you just sent and the old trace_recursive_lock() patch, hope to have a v3 out soon. Tom