From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Galbraith Subject: Re: bisected - arm64 kvm unit test failures Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2018 15:57:26 +0200 Message-ID: <1534946246.8087.11.camel@gmx.de> References: <20180727215710.zq6gkoqzlb4ca7qv@linutronix.de> <1532768831.9882.71.camel@gmx.de> <1532847330.1618.8.camel@gmx.de> <1532864867.1618.32.camel@gmx.de> <1532967899.30205.62.camel@gmx.de> <1533061729.12487.26.camel@gmx.de> <1534945105.8087.8.camel@gmx.de> <77ab9a57-b3ad-d8fa-7dc8-b94527f56139@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: LKML , linux-rt-users , Steven Rostedt To: Marc Zyngier , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Thomas Gleixner Return-path: In-Reply-To: <77ab9a57-b3ad-d8fa-7dc8-b94527f56139@arm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-rt-users.vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2018-08-22 at 14:50 +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On 22/08/18 14:38, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > On Tue, 2018-08-21 at 16:34 +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > >> Could you give that patchlet[1] a go? It solves a similar issue for me > >> on a different platform. > >> > >> [1] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/pipermail/kvmarm/2018-August/032469.html > > > > Yup, all better. > > Now I'm not sure it actually fixes anything. Alex's test case seem to > have opened a new can of worms... In tracing hell at the moment. I'll keep the test box reserved a while longer. When you get it's other leg stuffed into the casket, if you want testing, holler. -Mike