From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tom Zanussi Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 20/22] tracing: Use hist trigger's var_ref array to destroy var_refs Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2018 15:01:36 -0600 Message-ID: <1544907696.10497.17.camel@kernel.org> References: <4d6103ab7b4fdef81a82e2977b4005a26212a726.1544483273.git.tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com> <20181215013119.dc796fd4d2d21535adb4cf6c@kernel.org> <1544808561.10497.15.camel@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Masami Hiramatsu , Steven Rostedt , Thomas Gleixner , vedang.patel@intel.com, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Joel Fernandes , Mathieu Desnoyers , julia@ni.com, linux-kernel , linux-rt-users To: Namhyung Kim Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-rt-users.vger.kernel.org Hi Namhyung, On Sat, 2018-12-15 at 15:50 +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > Hi Tom and Masami, > > On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 2:29 AM Tom Zanussi > wrote: > > > > Hi Masami, > > > > On Sat, 2018-12-15 at 01:31 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > > > On Mon, 10 Dec 2018 18:01:34 -0600 > > > Tom Zanussi wrote: > > > > > > > From: Tom Zanussi > > > > > > > > Since every var ref for a trigger has an entry in the var_ref[] > > > > array, > > > > use that to destroy the var_refs, instead of piecemeal via the > > > > field > > > > expressions. > > > > > > > > This allows us to avoid having to keep and treat differently > > > > separate > > > > lists for the action-related references, which future patches > > > > will > > > > remove. > > > > > > I'm not so sure, but this seems a bugfix... if so, please move > > > this > > > at > > > the top of this series. > > > > > > > No, none of these are bugfixes - patches 17-22 are just some > > additional > > cleanup that try to make the code easier to follow after Namhyung's > > comments that things were confusing here. > > > > Actually, what I should probably do is make these a separate > > series.. > > Agreed, I also think it's getting bigger and having these cleanups > before the actual change would make things little bit easier IMHO. > Yep, that's what I'll do then. Thanks, Tom