From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68502C11D2F for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 15:18:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3006420838 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 15:18:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1582557506; bh=DLu6CZLAqXOcMgBMtSpGhIIlVElRiTBD+R4gl8NONQc=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=tS8DuwB81QGJoGX0wOdHZyGP0EGOazZsIC8r8kkTj19FNiNG22Whvia975utTaB1E 74+Mwlmk3BwkGC8XgINKULeAT5qfmChHLpgnIKAN7dbh/4+4vSzzHLOGhDt8qnHYK+ LTr1QHVNK5b+31kAoPKjy3rCKl9wt+DL828m+kfQ= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727746AbgBXPSZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Feb 2020 10:18:25 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:43148 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727448AbgBXPSZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Feb 2020 10:18:25 -0500 Received: from tzanussi-mobl7 (c-98-220-238-81.hsd1.il.comcast.net [98.220.238.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 944CC2082F; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 15:18:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1582557505; bh=DLu6CZLAqXOcMgBMtSpGhIIlVElRiTBD+R4gl8NONQc=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=U/uYHEDH/7IANEj/CJorA6T9DdSZroRnJMpGPMH5ukJ8OEnzjqhTVen3gJkNTfY/z VZHMMqdxVXLkGPPHBwcQhLwTanRCtAvkR7wO/PVXnZzv/sg3loHaaLoNbMatz3H1z4 rxJIn+UqIX5hXLUj8mgkYOkqFYAg6SP4eiztbftw= Message-ID: <1582557503.12738.22.camel@kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH RT 20/25] kmemleak: Cosmetic changes From: Tom Zanussi To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Cc: LKML , linux-rt-users , Steven Rostedt , Thomas Gleixner , Carsten Emde , John Kacur , Daniel Wagner Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 09:18:23 -0600 In-Reply-To: <20200224091204.xzn6cheydarek6ex@linutronix.de> References: <20200224091204.xzn6cheydarek6ex@linutronix.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.26.1-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2020-02-24 at 10:12 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 2020-02-21 15:24:48 [-0600], zanussi@kernel.org wrote: > > From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior > > > > v4.14.170-rt75-rc1 stable review patch. > > If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > This makes no sense to apply it. I updated my patch in the RT queue > to > what has been sent (and later merged) upstream. Then I was forced to > sync the non-rebase branch with the rebase branch. This is the > result. > > What should be applied instead is > fb2c57edcb943 ("kmemleak: Change the lock of kmemleak_object to > raw_spinlock_t") > I did apply that patch (as patch 14/25 of this series). This patch seemed like it was adding some comment bits mised for that one, which is all it does. Thanks, Tom > from the v4.19-RT branch. > > Sebastian