From: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
<bigeasy-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: mtk.manpages-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
linux-man-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org,
linux-rt-users-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mlock.2: document that is a bad idea to fork() after mlock()
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 07:20:40 +1200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1f2afdf9-0fcc-fdb3-4ea3-e1770d4434f3@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160830085911.5336-1-bigeasy-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>
Hello Sebastian
On 08/30/2016 08:59 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> fork() will remove the write PTE bit from the page table on each VMA
> which will be copied via COW. A such such, the memory is available but
> marked read only in the page table and will fault on write access.
> This renders the previous mlock() operation almost useless because in a
> multi threaded application the RT thread may block on mmap_sem while the
> thread with low priority is holding the mmap_sem (for instance because
> it is allocating memory which needs to be mapped in).
>
> There is actually nothing we can do to mitigate the outcome. We could
> add a warning to the kernel for people that are not yet aware of the
> updated documentation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>
Thanks! Patch applied.
Cheers,
Michael
> ---
> man2/mlock.2 | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/man2/mlock.2 b/man2/mlock.2
> index e34bb3b4e045..27f80f6664ef 100644
> --- a/man2/mlock.2
> +++ b/man2/mlock.2
> @@ -350,6 +350,20 @@ settings are not inherited by a child created via
> and are cleared during an
> .BR execve (2).
>
> +Note that
> +.BR fork (2)
> +will prepare the address space for a copy-on-write operation. The consequence
> +is that any write access that follows will cause a page fault which in turn may
> +cause high latencies for a real-time process. Therefore it is crucial not to
> +invoke
> +.BR fork (2)
> +after the
> +.BR mlockall ()
> +or
> +.BR mlock ()
> +operation not even from thread which runs at a low priority within a process
> +which also has a thread running at elevated priority.
> +
> The memory lock on an address range is automatically removed
> if the address range is unmapped via
> .BR munmap (2).
>
--
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-30 19:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-30 8:59 [PATCH] mlock.2: document that is a bad idea to fork() after mlock() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
[not found] ` <20160830085911.5336-1-bigeasy-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>
2016-08-30 19:20 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1f2afdf9-0fcc-fdb3-4ea3-e1770d4434f3@gmail.com \
--to=mtk.manpages-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=bigeasy-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-man-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).