From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: [(RT RFC) PATCH v2 6/9] add a loop counter based timeout mechanism Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 14:19:47 -0800 Message-ID: <20080225221947.GA2852@suse.de> References: <20080225155959.11268.35541.stgit@novell1.haskins.net> <20080225160108.11268.1451.stgit@novell1.haskins.net> <20080225220601.GH2659@elf.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Gregory Haskins , mingo@elte.hu, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, tglx@linutronix.de, rostedt@goodmis.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bill.huey@gmail.com, kevin@hilman.org, cminyard@mvista.com, dsingleton@mvista.com, dwalker@mvista.com, npiggin@suse.de, dsaxena@plexity.net, ak@suse.de, acme@redhat.com, sdietrich@novell.com, pmorreale@novell.com, mkohari@novell.com To: Pavel Machek Return-path: Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:58073 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758682AbYBYWTp (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Feb 2008 17:19:45 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080225220601.GH2659@elf.ucw.cz> Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 11:06:01PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Mon 2008-02-25 11:01:08, Gregory Haskins wrote: > > From: Sven Dietrich > > Why is this good idea? It preserves the original author when the patch is applied by git. Otherwise the author of the email would be classified as the author of the patch, which is not the correct thing to have happen a lot of times (like this one.) thanks, greg k-h