From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ego@in.ibm.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>, Ted Tso <tytso@us.ibm.com>,
dvhltc@us.ibm.com, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
bunk@kernel.org, Josh Triplett <josh@freedesktop.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
zippel@linux-m68k.org
Subject: [PATCH] move PREEMPT_RCU config option back under PREEMPT
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 12:22:07 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080304202207.GA10926@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080303185511.GE12453@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Hello!
The original preemptible-RCU patch put the choice between classic and
preemptible RCU into kernel/Kconfig.preempt, which resulted in build
failures on machines not supporting CONFIG_PREEMPT. This choice was
therefore moved to init/Kconfig, which worked, but placed the choice
between classic and preemptible RCU at the top level, a very obtuse choice
indeed. This patch changes from the Kconfig "choice" mechanism to a pair
of booleans, only one of which (CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU) is user-visible,
and is located in kernel/Kconfig.preempt, where one would expect it
to be. The other (CONFIG_CLASSIC_RCU) is in init/Kconfig so that it
is available to all architectures, hopefully avoiding build breakage.
Thanks to Roman Zippel for suggesting this approach.
I have tested this, but sadly do not have access to a machine that does
not support CONFIG_PREEMPT. However, I did edit my config in an attempt
to simulate this situation.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
init/Kconfig | 34 +++-------------------------------
kernel/Kconfig.preempt | 15 +++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
diff -urpNa -X dontdiff linux-2.6.25-rc3/init/Kconfig linux-2.6.25-rc3-preempt_rcu/init/Kconfig
--- linux-2.6.25-rc3/init/Kconfig 2008-02-26 16:58:42.000000000 -0800
+++ linux-2.6.25-rc3-preempt_rcu/init/Kconfig 2008-03-01 11:30:59.000000000 -0800
@@ -860,38 +860,10 @@ source "block/Kconfig"
config PREEMPT_NOTIFIERS
bool
-choice
- prompt "RCU implementation type:"
- default CLASSIC_RCU
- help
- This allows you to choose either the classic RCU implementation
- that is designed for best read-side performance on non-realtime
- systems, or the preemptible RCU implementation for best latency
- on realtime systems. Note that some kernel preemption modes
- will restrict your choice.
-
- Select the default if you are unsure.
-
config CLASSIC_RCU
- bool "Classic RCU"
+ def_bool !PREEMPT_RCU
help
This option selects the classic RCU implementation that is
designed for best read-side performance on non-realtime
- systems.
-
- Say Y if you are unsure.
-
-config PREEMPT_RCU
- bool "Preemptible RCU"
- depends on PREEMPT
- help
- This option reduces the latency of the kernel by making certain
- RCU sections preemptible. Normally RCU code is non-preemptible, if
- this option is selected then read-only RCU sections become
- preemptible. This helps latency, but may expose bugs due to
- now-naive assumptions about each RCU read-side critical section
- remaining on a given CPU through its execution.
-
- Say N if you are unsure.
-
-endchoice
+ systems. Classic RCU is the default. Note that the
+ PREEMPT_RCU symbol is used to select/deselect this option.
diff -urpNa -X dontdiff linux-2.6.25-rc3/kernel/Kconfig.preempt linux-2.6.25-rc3-preempt_rcu/kernel/Kconfig.preempt
--- linux-2.6.25-rc3/kernel/Kconfig.preempt 2008-02-26 16:58:42.000000000 -0800
+++ linux-2.6.25-rc3-preempt_rcu/kernel/Kconfig.preempt 2008-03-01 11:35:39.000000000 -0800
@@ -52,8 +52,23 @@ config PREEMPT
endchoice
+config PREEMPT_RCU
+ bool "Preemptible RCU"
+ depends on PREEMPT
+ default n
+ help
+ This option reduces the latency of the kernel by making certain
+ RCU sections preemptible. Normally RCU code is non-preemptible, if
+ this option is selected then read-only RCU sections become
+ preemptible. This helps latency, but may expose bugs due to
+ now-naive assumptions about each RCU read-side critical section
+ remaining on a given CPU through its execution.
+
+ Say N if you are unsure.
+
config RCU_TRACE
bool "Enable tracing for RCU - currently stats in debugfs"
+ depends on PREEMPT_RCU
select DEBUG_FS
default y
help
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-04 20:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-13 17:03 [RFC PATCH 0/6] RCU: Preemptible-RCU Gautham R Shenoy
2007-12-13 17:14 ` [RFC PATCH 1/6] Preempt-RCU: Use softirq instead of tasklets for RCU Gautham R Shenoy
2007-12-13 17:15 ` [RFC PATCH 2/6] Preempt-RCU: Reorganize RCU code into rcuclassic.c and rcupdate.c Gautham R Shenoy
2007-12-14 14:51 ` Johannes Weiner
2007-12-14 16:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-12-13 17:16 ` [RFC PATCH 3/6] Preempt-RCU: Fix rcu_barrier for preemptive environment Gautham R Shenoy
2007-12-13 17:16 ` [RFC PATCH 4/6] Preempt-RCU: Implementation Gautham R Shenoy
2008-02-29 4:34 ` Roman Zippel
2008-02-29 4:53 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-02-29 12:38 ` Roman Zippel
2008-02-29 13:55 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-03-01 19:39 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-03-01 21:07 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-03-02 3:09 ` Roman Zippel
2008-03-02 3:06 ` Roman Zippel
2008-03-03 18:55 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-03-04 20:22 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2008-03-04 20:55 ` [PATCH] move PREEMPT_RCU config option back under PREEMPT Steven Rostedt
2008-03-05 0:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-03-05 2:06 ` Roman Zippel
2008-03-05 19:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-03-04 20:49 ` [RFC PATCH 4/6] Preempt-RCU: Implementation Roman Zippel
2008-02-29 13:53 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-02-29 14:31 ` Roman Zippel
2007-12-13 17:17 ` [RFC PATCH 5/6] Preempt-RCU: CPU Hotplug handling Gautham R Shenoy
2007-12-13 17:18 ` [RFC PATCH 6/6] Preempt-RCU: Update RCU Documentation Gautham R Shenoy
2007-12-13 20:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-13 21:06 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2007-12-13 17:36 ` [RFC PATCH 0/6] RCU: Preemptible-RCU Steven Rostedt
2007-12-13 20:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-13 20:56 ` Steven Rostedt
2007-12-13 21:09 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2007-12-13 20:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-13 23:41 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080304202207.GA10926@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bunk@kernel.org \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dvhltc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
--cc=josh@freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tytso@us.ibm.com \
--cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).