From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] sched fixes for suboptimal balancing
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 20:55:16 +0200
Message-ID: <20080428185515.GF4491@elte.hu>
References: <480DDC48.BA47.005A.0@novell.com> <20080423111313.4981.37345.stgit@novell1.haskins.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org
To: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>
Return-path: <linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:44201 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S932423AbYD1Szc (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:55:32 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20080423111313.4981.37345.stgit@novell1.haskins.net>
Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-rt-users.vger.kernel.org>


* Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> wrote:

> Hi Ingo,
> 
> Here are my proposed fixes for the issue Dmitry has highlighted in:
> 
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/22/296
> 
> This is an RFC, and it applies to sched-devel.

thanks Gregory - picked them up for more testing.

	Ingo