From: Juergen Beisert <jbe@pengutronix.de>
To: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: "Jürgen Mell" <j.mell@t-online.de>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>,
"Clark Williams" <williams@redhat.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Carsten Emde" <ce@ceag.ch>
Subject: Re: 2.6.26-rt1
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 15:30:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200808131530.33130.jbe@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080801211117.GD14851@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Freitag, 1. August 2008, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 11:01:32AM +0200, Jürgen Mell wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 30. July 2008, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > We are pleased to announce the 2.6.26-rt1 tree, which can be
> > > downloaded from the location:
> >
> > I have tried the new kernel and have some good news and some bad news:
> >
> > The good news: The machine boots and seems to run without major problems.
> >
> > The bad news: It produces continuously lots of bug messages in the error
> > logs (cf. attached dmesg.tgz). The error at rtmutex.c:743 was already
> > present in 2.6.25-rt* when ACPI was enabled. The 'using smp_processor_id
> > () in preemptible code' is new here with 2.6.26.
> >
> > Machine is an old Athlon XP (single core) on an EPOX mainboard with VIA
> > chipset.
> >
> > If I can help with testing, please let me know.
>
> The following patch should clear things up. It is against 2.6.25.8-rt7,
> but should still apply.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Disable preemption around statistics for RCU boost and unboost calls.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>
> rcupreempt-boost.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff -urpNa -X dontdiff linux-2.6.25.8-rt7/kernel/rcupreempt-boost.c
> linux-2.6.25.8-rt7-preemptfix/kernel/rcupreempt-boost.c ---
> linux-2.6.25.8-rt7/kernel/rcupreempt-boost.c 2008-06-24 14:14:52.000000000
> -0700 +++
> linux-2.6.25.8-rt7-preemptfix/kernel/rcupreempt-boost.c 2008-06-24
> 14:38:59.000000000 -0700 @@ -205,11 +205,23 @@
> RCU_BOOST_TRACE_FUNC_DECL(boost_readers)
> RCU_BOOST_TRACE_FUNC_DECL(try_unboost_readers)
> RCU_BOOST_TRACE_FUNC_DECL(unboost_readers)
> RCU_BOOST_TRACE_FUNC_DECL(over_taken)
> +static void rcu_trace_boost_boost_called_preempt(void)
> +{
> + preempt_disable();
> + rcu_trace_boost_boost_called(RCU_BOOST_ME);
> + preempt_enable();
> +}
> +static void rcu_trace_boost_unboost_called_preempt(void)
> +{
> + preempt_disable();
> + rcu_trace_boost_unboost_called(RCU_BOOST_ME);
> + preempt_enable();
> +}
> #else /* CONFIG_RCU_TRACE */
> /* These were created by the above macro "RCU_BOOST_TRACE_FUNC_DECL" */
> -# define rcu_trace_boost_task_boost_called(rbd) do { } while (0)
> +# define rcu_trace_boost_task_boost_called_preempt(rbd) do { } while (0)
> # define rcu_trace_boost_task_boosted(rbd) do { } while (0)
> -# define rcu_trace_boost_boost_called(rbd) do { } while (0)
> +# define rcu_trace_boost_boost_called_preempt(rbd) do { } while (0)
> # define rcu_trace_boost_try_boost(rbd) do { } while (0)
> # define rcu_trace_boost_boosted(rbd) do { } while (0)
> # define rcu_trace_boost_unboost_called(rbd) do { } while (0)
> @@ -261,7 +273,7 @@ void __rcu_preempt_boost(void)
>
> WARN_ON(!current->rcu_read_lock_nesting);
>
> - rcu_trace_boost_boost_called(RCU_BOOST_ME);
> + rcu_trace_boost_boost_called_preempt();
>
> /* check to see if we are already boosted */
> if (unlikely(rcu_is_boosted(curr)))
> @@ -313,7 +325,7 @@ void __rcu_preempt_unboost(void)
> int prio;
> unsigned long flags;
>
> - rcu_trace_boost_unboost_called(RCU_BOOST_ME);
> + rcu_trace_boost_unboost_called_preempt();
>
> /* if not boosted, then ignore */
> if (likely(!rcu_is_boosted(curr)))
>
Using this patch on top of 2.6.26-rt1 results into:
[...]
CC kernel/rcupreempt-boost.o
kernel/rcupreempt-boost.c: In function 'rcu_boost_task':
kernel/rcupreempt-boost.c:249: error: implicit declaration of function 'rcu_trace_boost_task_boost_called'
kernel/rcupreempt-boost.c: In function '__rcu_preempt_unboost':
kernel/rcupreempt-boost.c:328: error: implicit declaration of function 'rcu_trace_boost_unboost_called_preempt'
when CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU_BOOST is enabled and target is a PowerPC of
type MPC5200B.
jbe
--
Dipl.-Ing. Juergen Beisert | http://www.pengutronix.de
Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry
Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686
Vertretung Sued/Muenchen, Germany
Phone: +49-8766-939 228 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-9
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-13 13:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-25 20:09 2.6.24.7-rt15 Thomas Gleixner
2008-07-26 11:03 ` 2.6.24.7-rt15 Carsten Emde
[not found] ` <1985e0f60807252248n581bdfa0s363f6ce0d283ec2c@mail.gmail.com>
2008-07-26 11:13 ` 2.6.24.7-rt15 Jaswinder Singh
2008-07-26 12:28 ` 2.6.24.7-rt15 Steven Rostedt
2008-07-26 13:22 ` 2.6.24.7-rt15 Daniel Walker
2008-07-26 18:28 ` 2.6.24.7-rt15 Jaswinder Singh
2008-07-27 16:16 ` 2.6.24.7-rt16 Thomas Gleixner
2008-07-27 20:28 ` 2.6.24.7-rt16 Avuton Olrich
2008-07-27 20:37 ` 2.6.24.7-rt16 Thomas Gleixner
2008-07-28 8:12 ` 2.6.24.7-rt16 Wolfgang Grandegger
2008-07-28 9:48 ` 2.6.24.7-rt16 Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-28 10:12 ` 2.6.24.7-rt16 Wolfgang Grandegger
2008-07-29 12:57 ` 2.6.24.7-rt16 Thomas Gleixner
2008-07-29 22:21 ` 2.6.26-rt1 Thomas Gleixner
2008-07-30 9:01 ` 2.6.26-rt1 Jürgen Mell
2008-07-30 17:18 ` [PATCH] Fix Bug messages Chirag Jog
2008-07-30 20:16 ` Jürgen Mell
2008-07-31 6:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-31 8:00 ` Sebastien Dugue
2008-07-31 10:13 ` John Kacur
2008-07-31 11:23 ` Sebastien Dugue
2008-07-31 13:49 ` John Kacur
2008-07-31 14:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-31 14:10 ` John Kacur
2008-07-31 14:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-31 14:35 ` Sebastien Dugue
2008-07-31 15:01 ` Clark Williams
2008-07-31 15:14 ` Sebastien Dugue
2008-08-01 21:11 ` 2.6.26-rt1 Paul E. McKenney
2008-08-13 13:30 ` Juergen Beisert [this message]
2008-08-13 16:37 ` 2.6.26-rt1 Paul E. McKenney
2008-07-30 14:31 ` 2.6.26-rt1 John Kacur
2008-07-30 14:41 ` 2.6.26-rt1 Ryan Hope
2008-08-01 21:11 ` 2.6.26-rt1 Paul E. McKenney
2008-08-11 8:36 ` 2.6.26-rt1 Juergen Beisert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200808131530.33130.jbe@pengutronix.de \
--to=jbe@pengutronix.de \
--cc=ce@ceag.ch \
--cc=j.mell@t-online.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=williams@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).