From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gregory Haskins Subject: [RT PATCH v2 1/2] RT: Remove comment that is no longer true Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2008 13:26:13 -0400 Message-ID: <20081003172612.23714.4547.stgit@dev.haskins.net> References: <20081003172221.23714.71575.stgit@dev.haskins.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, dvhltc@us.ibm.com, dino@in.ibm.com, Gilles.Carry@bull.net To: Chirag Jog Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20081003172221.23714.71575.stgit@dev.haskins.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-rt-users.vger.kernel.org We fixed the condition noted in the comment with the "pushable_tasks" logic, but forgot to remove this comment. Lets clean it up. Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins --- kernel/sched_rt.c | 10 ---------- 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched_rt.c b/kernel/sched_rt.c index 57a0c0d..59ead84 100644 --- a/kernel/sched_rt.c +++ b/kernel/sched_rt.c @@ -1125,16 +1125,6 @@ out: return 1; } -/* - * TODO: Currently we just use the second highest prio task on - * the queue, and stop when it can't migrate (or there's - * no more RT tasks). There may be a case where a lower - * priority RT task has a different affinity than the - * higher RT task. In this case the lower RT task could - * possibly be able to migrate where as the higher priority - * RT task could not. We currently ignore this issue. - * Enhancements are welcome! - */ static void push_rt_tasks(struct rq *rq) { /* push_rt_task will return true if it moved an RT */