From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>
To: mingo@elte.hu, rostedt@goodmis.org, peterz@infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, =linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 1/3] sched: track the next-highest priority on each runqueue
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 09:26:19 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081111142619.28477.33996.stgit@dev.haskins.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081111142323.28477.41235.stgit@dev.haskins.net>
We will use this later in the series to reduce the amount of rq-lock
contention during a pull operation
Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>
---
kernel/sched.c | 8 +++-
kernel/sched_rt.c | 115 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
2 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index 6625c3c..a29193b 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -448,7 +448,10 @@ struct rt_rq {
struct rt_prio_array active;
unsigned long rt_nr_running;
#if defined CONFIG_SMP || defined CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED
- int highest_prio; /* highest queued rt task prio */
+ struct {
+ int curr; /* highest queued rt task prio */
+ int next; /* next highest */
+ } highest_prio;
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
unsigned long rt_nr_migratory;
@@ -8040,7 +8043,8 @@ static void init_rt_rq(struct rt_rq *rt_rq, struct rq *rq)
__set_bit(MAX_RT_PRIO, array->bitmap);
#if defined CONFIG_SMP || defined CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED
- rt_rq->highest_prio = MAX_RT_PRIO;
+ rt_rq->highest_prio.curr = MAX_RT_PRIO;
+ rt_rq->highest_prio.next = MAX_RT_PRIO;
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
rt_rq->rt_nr_migratory = 0;
diff --git a/kernel/sched_rt.c b/kernel/sched_rt.c
index b446dc8..d3b54ba 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_rt.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_rt.c
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ static void sched_rt_rq_enqueue(struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
if (rt_rq->rt_nr_running) {
if (rt_se && !on_rt_rq(rt_se))
enqueue_rt_entity(rt_se);
- if (rt_rq->highest_prio < curr->prio)
+ if (rt_rq->highest_prio.curr < curr->prio)
resched_task(curr);
}
}
@@ -473,7 +473,7 @@ static inline int rt_se_prio(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se)
struct rt_rq *rt_rq = group_rt_rq(rt_se);
if (rt_rq)
- return rt_rq->highest_prio;
+ return rt_rq->highest_prio.curr;
#endif
return rt_task_of(rt_se)->prio;
@@ -547,33 +547,66 @@ static void update_curr_rt(struct rq *rq)
}
}
+#if defined CONFIG_SMP || defined CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED
+
+static struct task_struct *pick_next_highest_task_rt(struct rq *rq, int cpu);
+
+static inline int next_prio(struct rq *rq)
+{
+ struct task_struct *next = pick_next_highest_task_rt(rq, rq->cpu);
+
+ if (next && rt_prio(next->prio))
+ return next->prio;
+ else
+ return MAX_RT_PRIO;
+}
+#endif
+
static inline
void inc_rt_tasks(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
{
- WARN_ON(!rt_prio(rt_se_prio(rt_se)));
- rt_rq->rt_nr_running++;
#if defined CONFIG_SMP || defined CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED
- if (rt_se_prio(rt_se) < rt_rq->highest_prio) {
+ int prio = rt_se_prio(rt_se);
+#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
- struct rq *rq = rq_of_rt_rq(rt_rq);
+ struct rq *rq = rq_of_rt_rq(rt_rq);
#endif
- rt_rq->highest_prio = rt_se_prio(rt_se);
+ WARN_ON(!rt_prio(prio));
+ rt_rq->rt_nr_running++;
+#if defined CONFIG_SMP || defined CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED
+ if (prio < rt_rq->highest_prio.curr) {
+
+ /*
+ * If the new task is higher in priority than anything on the
+ * run-queue, we have a new high that must be published to
+ * the world. We also know that the previous high becomes
+ * our next-highest.
+ */
+ rt_rq->highest_prio.next = rt_rq->highest_prio.curr;
+ rt_rq->highest_prio.curr = prio;
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
if (rq->online)
- cpupri_set(&rq->rd->cpupri, rq->cpu,
- rt_se_prio(rt_se));
+ cpupri_set(&rq->rd->cpupri, rq->cpu, prio);
#endif
- }
+ } else if (prio == rt_rq->highest_prio.curr)
+ /*
+ * If the next task is equal in priority to the highest on
+ * the run-queue, then we implicitly know that the next highest
+ * task cannot be any lower than current
+ */
+ rt_rq->highest_prio.next = prio;
+ else if (prio < rt_rq->highest_prio.next)
+ /*
+ * Otherwise, we need to recompute next-highest
+ */
+ rt_rq->highest_prio.next = next_prio(rq);
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
- if (rt_se->nr_cpus_allowed > 1) {
- struct rq *rq = rq_of_rt_rq(rt_rq);
-
+ if (rt_se->nr_cpus_allowed > 1)
rq->rt.rt_nr_migratory++;
- }
- update_rt_migration(rq_of_rt_rq(rt_rq));
+ update_rt_migration(rq);
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED
if (rt_se_boosted(rt_se))
@@ -589,8 +622,9 @@ void inc_rt_tasks(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
static inline
void dec_rt_tasks(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
{
-#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
- int highest_prio = rt_rq->highest_prio;
+#if defined CONFIG_SMP || defined CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED
+ struct rq *rq = rq_of_rt_rq(rt_rq);
+ int highest_prio = rt_rq->highest_prio.curr;
#endif
WARN_ON(!rt_prio(rt_se_prio(rt_se)));
@@ -598,33 +632,34 @@ void dec_rt_tasks(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
rt_rq->rt_nr_running--;
#if defined CONFIG_SMP || defined CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED
if (rt_rq->rt_nr_running) {
- struct rt_prio_array *array;
+ int prio = rt_se_prio(rt_se);
+
+ WARN_ON(prio < rt_rq->highest_prio.curr);
- WARN_ON(rt_se_prio(rt_se) < rt_rq->highest_prio);
- if (rt_se_prio(rt_se) == rt_rq->highest_prio) {
- /* recalculate */
- array = &rt_rq->active;
- rt_rq->highest_prio =
+ /*
+ * This may have been our highest or next-highest priority
+ * task and therefore we may have some recomputation to do
+ */
+ if (prio == rt_rq->highest_prio.curr) {
+ struct rt_prio_array *array = &rt_rq->active;
+
+ rt_rq->highest_prio.curr =
sched_find_first_bit(array->bitmap);
- } /* otherwise leave rq->highest prio alone */
+ }
+
+ if (prio == rt_rq->highest_prio.next)
+ rt_rq->highest_prio.next = next_prio(rq);
} else
- rt_rq->highest_prio = MAX_RT_PRIO;
+ rt_rq->highest_prio.curr = MAX_RT_PRIO;
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
- if (rt_se->nr_cpus_allowed > 1) {
- struct rq *rq = rq_of_rt_rq(rt_rq);
+ if (rt_se->nr_cpus_allowed > 1)
rq->rt.rt_nr_migratory--;
- }
- if (rt_rq->highest_prio != highest_prio) {
- struct rq *rq = rq_of_rt_rq(rt_rq);
-
- if (rq->online)
- cpupri_set(&rq->rd->cpupri, rq->cpu,
- rt_rq->highest_prio);
- }
+ if (rq->online && rt_rq->highest_prio.curr != highest_prio)
+ cpupri_set(&rq->rd->cpupri, rq->cpu, rt_rq->highest_prio.curr);
- update_rt_migration(rq_of_rt_rq(rt_rq));
+ update_rt_migration(rq);
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
#ifdef CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED
if (rt_se_boosted(rt_se))
@@ -1069,7 +1104,7 @@ static struct rq *find_lock_lowest_rq(struct task_struct *task, struct rq *rq)
}
/* If this rq is still suitable use it. */
- if (lowest_rq->rt.highest_prio > task->prio)
+ if (lowest_rq->rt.highest_prio.curr > task->prio)
break;
/* try again */
@@ -1257,7 +1292,7 @@ static int pull_rt_task(struct rq *this_rq)
static void pre_schedule_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
{
/* Try to pull RT tasks here if we lower this rq's prio */
- if (unlikely(rt_task(prev)) && rq->rt.highest_prio > prev->prio)
+ if (unlikely(rt_task(prev)) && rq->rt.highest_prio.curr > prev->prio)
pull_rt_task(rq);
}
@@ -1343,7 +1378,7 @@ static void rq_online_rt(struct rq *rq)
__enable_runtime(rq);
- cpupri_set(&rq->rd->cpupri, rq->cpu, rq->rt.highest_prio);
+ cpupri_set(&rq->rd->cpupri, rq->cpu, rq->rt.highest_prio.curr);
}
/* Assumes rq->lock is held */
@@ -1426,7 +1461,7 @@ static void prio_changed_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
* can release the rq lock and p could migrate.
* Only reschedule if p is still on the same runqueue.
*/
- if (p->prio > rq->rt.highest_prio && rq->curr == p)
+ if (p->prio > rq->rt.highest_prio.curr && rq->curr == p)
resched_task(p);
#else
/* For UP simply resched on drop of prio */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-11 14:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-11 14:26 [RFC PATCH 0/3] Series short description Gregory Haskins
2008-11-11 14:26 ` Gregory Haskins [this message]
2008-11-11 14:26 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] sched: use highest_prio.curr for pull threshold Gregory Haskins
2008-11-11 14:26 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] sched: use highest_prio.next to optimize pull operations Gregory Haskins
2008-11-11 17:56 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] Series short description Ingo Molnar
2008-11-11 18:51 ` Gregory Haskins
2008-11-11 19:31 ` Chris Friesen
2008-11-11 19:50 ` Gregory Haskins
[not found] ` <4936E587.40700@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <4936EC83.2060900@oracle.com>
2008-12-03 20:39 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] sched: track next-highest priority (was "Series short discription") Gregory Haskins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081111142619.28477.33996.stgit@dev.haskins.net \
--to=ghaskins@novell.com \
--cc==linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).