From: Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>
To: RT <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [RFC] [rt-tests] change to cyclictest behavior
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 13:04:00 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100106130400.7f30ae55@torg> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1222 bytes --]
RT-ers,
I have a problem with the way cyclictest sets up measurement threads,
but before I went and changed things I thought I would ask if people
cherished this particular behavior.
Currently, when cyclictest is run with multiple threads (i.e. -t
option) it distributes both the sample interval and the realtime
priority by adding the 'distance' parameter to the interval and
decrementing the priority by one. This means if you have a distance of
500us (default), a specified RT priority of 95 and start four threads,
they will be started with the following parameters:
$ cyclictest -t4 -p95
Will give you:
thread priority sample interval
0 95 500
1 94 1000
2 93 1500
3 92 2000
What I'd like to do is modify this logic so that when '-a' (affinity) is
specified, the priority and sample interval will not be altered. I
don't think there's any point in distributing the priority's and
sample intervals when the measurement threads are pinned to their own
CPU.
So:
$ cyclictest -t4 -p95 -a
Would have each thread at SCHED_FIFO 95 and a sample interval of 500us.
Note that this behavior also occurs when the histogram (-h) option is
specified).
Thoughts?
Clark
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2010-01-06 19:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-06 19:04 Clark Williams [this message]
2010-01-06 19:39 ` [RFC] [rt-tests] change to cyclictest behavior John Kacur
2010-01-06 21:39 ` Carsten Emde
2010-01-06 22:04 ` Clark Williams
2010-01-06 22:24 ` Carsten Emde
2010-01-06 22:27 ` Clark Williams
2010-01-06 22:50 ` Carsten Emde
2010-01-07 0:30 ` Leyendecker, Robert
2010-01-07 7:09 ` Carsten Emde
2010-01-07 7:23 ` Carsten Emde
2010-01-07 14:47 ` Clark Williams
2010-01-07 14:54 ` Carsten Emde
2010-01-12 16:59 ` Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
2010-01-12 17:04 ` Clark Williams
2010-01-12 17:13 ` Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100106130400.7f30ae55@torg \
--to=williams@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).