From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
To: Geunsik Lim <leemgs1@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] munmap: kbuild menu for munmap interface
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 08:45:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110425084508.dda5ec8f.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1303728272-11408-4-git-send-email-leemgs1@gmail.com>
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 19:44:31 +0900 Geunsik Lim wrote:
> From: Geunsik Lim <geunsik.lim@samsung.com>
>
> Support kbuild menu to select memory unmap operation size
> at build time.
>
> Signed-off-by: Geunsik Lim <geunsik.lim@samsung.com>
> Acked-by: Hyunjin Choi <hj89.choi@samsung.com>
> ---
> init/Kconfig | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> mm/memory.c | 21 +++++++++++-----
> 2 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig
> index 56240e7..0983961 100644
> --- a/init/Kconfig
> +++ b/init/Kconfig
> @@ -557,6 +557,76 @@ config LOG_BUF_SHIFT
> 13 => 8 KB
> 12 => 4 KB
>
> +config PREEMPT_OK_MUNMAP_RANGE
> + int "Memory unmap unit on preemption mode (8 => 32KB)"
> + depends on !PREEMPT_NONE
> + range 8 2048
> + default 8
> + help
> + unmap_vmas(=unmap a range of memory covered by a list of vma) is treading
unmap_vmas (= unmap a range ...
> + a delicate and uncomfortable line between hi-performance and low-latency.
high performane and low latency.
> + We've chosen to improve performance at the expense of latency.
This option improves performance at the expense of latency.
> +
> + So although there may be no need to resched right now,
reschedule
> + if we keep on gathering more and more without flushing,
gathering more and more <what> ?
> + we'll be very unresponsive when a resched is needed later on.
reschedule
> +
> + Consider the best suitable result between high performance and low latency
> + on preemption mode.
> + Select optimal munmap size to return memory space that is allocated by mmap system call.
> +
> + For example, For recording mass files, if we try to unmap memory that we allocated
for
> + with 100MB for recording in embedded devices, we have to wait for more than 3seconds to
3 seconds
(but try not to put text over 80 columns, please)
> + change mode from play mode to recording mode. This results from the unit of memory
> + unmapped size when we are recording mass files like camcorder particularly.
> +
> + This value can be changed after boot using the
> + /proc/sys/vm/munmap_unit_size tunable.
Indent above with tab + 2 spaces.
> +
> + Examples:
> + 2048 => 8,388,608bytes : for straight-line efficiency
> + 1024 => 4,194,304bytes
> + 512 => 2,097,152bytes
> + 256 => 1,048,576bytes
> + 128 => 524,288bytes
> + 64 => 262,144bytes
> + 32 => 131,072bytes
> + 16 => 65,536bytes
> + 8 => 32,768bytes : for low-latency (*default)
All of above would be better with added space before "bytes", as, e.g.:
8 => 32,768 bytes
> +
> +config PREEMPT_NO_MUNMAP_RANGE
> + int "Memory unmap unit on non-preemption mode (1024 => 4MB)"
> + depends on PREEMPT_NONE
> + range 8 2048
> + default 1024
> + help
> +
> + unmap_vmas(=unmap a range of memory covered by a list of vma) is treading
unmap_vmas (= unmap
> + a delicate and uncomfortable line between hi-performance and low-latency.
high performance and low latency.
> + We've chosen to improve performance at the expense of latency.
This option improves performance at the expense of latency.
> +
> + So although there may be no need to resched right now,
reschedule
> + if we keep on gathering more and more without flushing,
more and more what?
> + we'll be very unresponsive when a resched is needed later on.
reschedule
> +
> + Consider the best suitable result between high performance and low latency
> + on preemption mode.
but this option is for non-preempt mode... so should that text above be modified?
> + Select optimal munmap size to return memory space that is allocated by mmap system call.
> +
> + This value can be changed after boot using the
> + /proc/sys/vm/munmap_unit_size tunable.
Indent above with tab + 2 spaces.
> +
> + Examples:
> + 2048 => 8,388,608bytes : for straight-line efficiency
> + 1024 => 4,194,304bytes (*default)
> + 512 => 2,097,152bytes
> + 256 => 1,048,576bytes
> + 128 => 524,288bytes
> + 64 => 262,144bytes
> + 32 => 131,072bytes
> + 16 => 65,536bytes
> + 8 => 32,768bytes : for low-latency
Use space before "bytes" in table above, please.
> +
> #
> # Architectures with an unreliable sched_clock() should select this:
> #
---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-25 15:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-25 10:44 [PATCH 0/4] munmap: Flexible mem unmap operation interface for scheduling latency Geunsik Lim
2011-04-25 10:44 ` [PATCH 1/4] munmap: mem unmap operation size handling Geunsik Lim
2011-04-25 10:44 ` [PATCH 2/4] munmap: sysctl extension for tunable parameter Geunsik Lim
2011-04-25 10:44 ` [PATCH 3/4] munmap: kbuild menu for munmap interface Geunsik Lim
2011-04-25 15:31 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-04-26 0:40 ` Geunsik Lim
2011-04-25 15:45 ` Randy Dunlap [this message]
2011-04-26 0:42 ` Geunsik Lim
2011-04-26 22:51 ` Hugh Dickins
2011-04-27 0:07 ` Geunsik Lim
2011-04-25 10:44 ` [PATCH 4/4] munmap: documentation of munmap operation interface Geunsik Lim
2011-04-25 19:47 ` [PATCH 0/4] munmap: Flexible mem unmap operation interface for scheduling latency Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-25 20:29 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-04-26 7:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-26 12:30 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-04-26 1:20 ` Geunsik Lim
2011-04-26 7:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-26 23:57 ` Geunsik Lim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110425084508.dda5ec8f.randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--to=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=leemgs1@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).