public inbox for linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>
To: RT <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, "Carsten Emde" <ce@ceag.ch>,
	"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"John Kacur" <jkacur@redhat.com>
Subject: rt-tests-0.82 available on github
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 15:54:55 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110921155455.61ab4745@redhat.com> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1694 bytes --]

While kernel.org is sorting out the security stuff, the rt-tests code
may be pulled from:

	git://github.com/clrkwllms/rt-tests.git

Note that we're now at version 0.82. Presently I only have the git
archive available (no tarballs). 

While investigating latency spikes in the 3.0.x-rt kernels, Thomas
spotted a case where an Intel quad-core Xeon was going into deep
sleep states and were all fighting to come out of sleep at the same
time (and consequently causing a big latency spike in cyclictest). 

While trying to figure out how to prevent deep cstates I remembered a
conversation I had with Arjan at the last Plumbers conference in
Boston. He mentioned the /dev/cpu_dma_latency interface to the power
managment code and that if you opened it and wrote a zero to it, you
effectively put the system into "idle=poll" mode until you closed the
file descriptor (see: Documentation/power/pm_qos_interface.txt). 

I've added a set_latency_target() function to cyclictest that by
default opens /dev/cpu_dma_latency and writes a zero to it, then holds
the file descriptor open for the duration of the cyclictest run. This
made a *huge* difference on some Intel Xeon's. Without this option, when
I was running cyclictest with the -b option, I saw latencies over
300us. When I added it, while tracing I never saw a latency over 30us.
Turning of -b, I never saw it go over 10us. I am doing further testing
now with other x86_64 systems. 

Of course this is very architecture specific, so YMMV, but I think it's
a valid mechanism to be used when measuring latency and I believe a
technique that many latency-sensitive applications might use to good
effect. 

Clark

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2011-09-21 20:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-21 20:54 Clark Williams [this message]
2011-09-21 21:24 ` rt-tests-0.82 available on github Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110921155455.61ab4745@redhat.com \
    --to=williams@redhat.com \
    --cc=ce@ceag.ch \
    --cc=jkacur@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox