From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yong Zhang Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH -rt 5/5] cpufreq: get rid of get_online_cpus()/put_online_cpus() Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 10:44:17 +0800 Message-ID: <20111024024416.GB24581@zhy> References: <1318762607-2261-1-git-send-email-yong.zhang0@gmail.com> <1318762607-2261-6-git-send-email-yong.zhang0@gmail.com> Reply-To: Yong Zhang Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org To: Thomas Gleixner Return-path: Received: from mail-bw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:44802 "EHLO mail-bw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752367Ab1JXCo2 (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Oct 2011 22:44:28 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 11:12:20AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Sun, 16 Oct 2011, Yong Zhang wrote: > > > Fix below false positive (seems this is not a real deadlock scenario) > > lockdep warning: > > This looks like you caused it with patch 1. Hmmm, yup. CPU_DOWN_PREPARE will be under cpu_hotplug.lock. > Both need a bit more > thought, but thanks for catching that. No sure whether it's big issue or not. Mind showing more about your concern? Thanks, Yong