* Scheduler model, revisited
@ 2011-12-13 19:17 Paul E. McKenney
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Paul E. McKenney @ 2011-12-13 19:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pjt; +Cc: linux-rt-users
Hello, Paul,
Back in Prague, you mentioned that a number of your scheduler-parameter
measurements were poor fits for the exponential distribution. Are they
a reasonable fit for a series of exponentially distributed Markov states?
For example, would they fit something of the following form?
a^2*t*e^(-a*t)
Or would a three-step series fit better?
(a^3*t^2*e^(-a*t))/2
And there is always the four-step series:
(a^4*t^3*e^(-a*t))/6
Or, in general:
(a^n*t^(n-1)*e^(-a*t))/(n-1)!
But please keep in mind that higher orders multiply my state space by
the number of steps in the series. ;-)
Thanx, Paul
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2011-12-13 19:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-12-13 19:17 Scheduler model, revisited Paul E. McKenney
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).