From: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
To: Christophe Huriaux <c.huriaux@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: BUG - "scheduling while atomic" on a irq handler (s3c-mci)
Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 19:49:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120509174931.GB31844@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEOomG9NEoQKqp=pMx0NpzGaFpHBimALwhemnZL4F-8g7XURkA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Christophe,
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 04:07:13PM +0200, Christophe Huriaux wrote:
> I am facing a problem while trying to run a rt-patched 3.2.y kernel
> with PREEMPT_RT_FULL on a mini2440 board (ARM based s3c2440 SoC) :
> whilst a vanilla kernel (with PREEMPT_LL) works like a charm,
> PREEMPT_RTB and PREEMPT_RT_FULL makes the MMC/SD driver (s3cmci)
> hang, which result in the kernel waiting indefinitely for the root fs
> to mount.
>
> I think that the IRQ handling of the driver is somehow disturbed by
> the changes made by the RT patch. When using PREEMPT_RTB I can see the
> following message in the console :
>
> BUG: scheduling while atomic: irq/37-s3c-mci/253/0x00000102
> Modules linked in:
> Function entered at [<c000e90c>] from [<c029f478>]
> Function entered at [<c029f478>] from [<c029fc3c>]
> Function entered at [<c029fc3c>] from [<c00559c0>]
> Function entered at [<c00559c0>] from [<c01dd4c8>]
> Function entered at [<c01dd4c8>] from [<c0024a0c>]
> Function entered at [<c0024a0c>] from [<c0024d9c>]
> Function entered at [<c0024d9c>] from [<c0024fe8>]
> Function entered at [<c0024fe8>] from [<c0025140>]
> Function entered at [<c0025140>] from [<c00549f0>]
> Function entered at [<c00549f0>] from [<c00547c4>]
> Function entered at [<c00547c4>] from [<c0039954>]
> Function entered at [<c0039954>] from [<c000a120>]
If you enable CONFIG_KALLSYMS you get a more usable backtrace.
Alternatively you can use
$CROSS_COMPILE-addr2line -e vmlinux 0xc000e90c
to get the file and line that resulted in the code at that address.
> When I run the kernel under Qemu, debug through gdb and put a
> breakpoint on unwind_backtace the details of the previous backtrace is
> :
>
> #0 unwind_backtrace (regs=0x0, tsk=0x0) at arch/arm/kernel/unwind.c:409
> #1 0xc029f478 in schedule_debug (prev=<optimized out>) at kernel/sched.c:4357
> #2 __schedule () at kernel/sched.c:4537
> #3 0xc029fc3c in schedule () at kernel/sched.c:4625
> #4 0xc00559c0 in synchronize_irq (irq=<optimized out>) at
> kernel/irq/manage.c:73
> Backtrace stopped: previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?)
>
> I don't see the "bug" message with PREEMPT_RT_FULL, the kernel just
> hang waiting for the rootfs. The problem did not occur in the 2.6.y
> tree AFAIK.
My guess is that for PREEMPT_RT_FULL the printk just doesn't make it to
your console driver because the data would only be given to it when the
atomic block is done.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-09 17:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-09 14:07 BUG - "scheduling while atomic" on a irq handler (s3c-mci) Christophe Huriaux
2012-05-09 17:49 ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2012-05-10 13:17 ` Christophe Huriaux
2012-05-15 17:38 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-05-20 5:27 ` [PATCH] genirq: don't sync irq thread if current happen to be the very irq thread Yong Zhang
2012-05-20 12:19 ` [PATCH v2] " Yong Zhang
2012-05-22 13:50 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-05-23 6:54 ` Yong Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120509174931.GB31844@pengutronix.de \
--to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=c.huriaux@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).