From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
To: David Daney <ddaney.cavm@gmail.com>
Cc: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>,
linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
david.daney@cavium.com, tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH -rt] MIPS: Octeon: convert smp_reserve_lock to raw spinlock
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 22:50:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120517205003.GE16397@linux-mips.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FB527B2.2010800@gmail.com>
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 09:30:42AM -0700, David Daney wrote:
> Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 09:30:42 -0700
> From: David Daney <ddaney.cavm@gmail.com>
> To: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>, ralf@linux-mips.org
> CC: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
> david.daney@cavium.com, tglx@linutronix.de
> Subject: Re: [PATCH -rt] MIPS: Octeon: convert smp_reserve_lock to raw
> spinlock
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> On 05/17/2012 03:15 AM, Yong Zhang wrote:
> >From: Yong Zhang<yong.zhang@windriver.com>
> >
> >Because __cpu_disable is called in atomic context and spinlock
> >is a mutex on -rt.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Yong Zhang<yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
> >---
> > arch/mips/cavium-octeon/smp.c | 6 +++---
> > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/arch/mips/cavium-octeon/smp.c b/arch/mips/cavium-octeon/smp.c
> >index ef9c34a..473c72b 100644
> >--- a/arch/mips/cavium-octeon/smp.c
> >+++ b/arch/mips/cavium-octeon/smp.c
> >@@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, cpu_state);
> >
> > extern void fixup_irqs(void);
> >
> >-static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(smp_reserve_lock);
> >+static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(smp_reserve_lock);
> >
>
> Ralf added this in 773cb77d (MIPS: Cavium: Add CPU hotplugging code.)
>
> I'm not even sure what this lock is supposed to be protecting, so I
> would like Ralf to take a look.
>
> You can add an Acked-by: from me for either this patch as is, or if
> Ralf thinks it is OK, removing the lock entirely.
>
> In any event we can merge this via Ralf's tree.
The 773cb77d patch has a long history but I think I first worked on it for
Wind River Linux 2.0 which was 2.6.21-based, then broke it out and pushed
it upstream. In 2.6.21 it was probably infected by the the smp_reserve_lock
virus in the s390 code for no good reason. So I agree, the lock can
be dropped and I'm queueing a patch to do so for 3.5.
Ralf
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-17 20:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-17 10:15 [PATCH -rt] MIPS: Octeon: convert smp_reserve_lock to raw spinlock Yong Zhang
2012-05-17 16:30 ` David Daney
2012-05-17 20:50 ` Ralf Baechle [this message]
2012-05-18 2:29 ` Yong Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120517205003.GE16397@linux-mips.org \
--to=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=david.daney@cavium.com \
--cc=ddaney.cavm@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=yong.zhang0@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).