linux-rt-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Carsten Emde <C.Emde@osadl.org>, John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH RT 5/8] rt: rwsem/rwlock: lockdep annotations
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 09:34:11 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121010133523.682693439@goodmis.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20121010133406.053812290@goodmis.org

[-- Attachment #1: 0005-rt-rwsem-rwlock-lockdep-annotations.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3030 bytes --]

From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

rwlocks and rwsems on RT do not allow multiple readers. Annotate the
lockdep acquire functions accordingly.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: stable-rt@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
 kernel/rt.c |   46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rt.c b/kernel/rt.c
index 092d6b3..aa10504 100644
--- a/kernel/rt.c
+++ b/kernel/rt.c
@@ -216,15 +216,17 @@ int __lockfunc rt_read_trylock(rwlock_t *rwlock)
 	 * write locked.
 	 */
 	migrate_disable();
-	if (rt_mutex_owner(lock) != current)
+	if (rt_mutex_owner(lock) != current) {
 		ret = rt_mutex_trylock(lock);
-	else if (!rwlock->read_depth)
+		if (ret)
+			rwlock_acquire(&rwlock->dep_map, 0, 1, _RET_IP_);
+	} else if (!rwlock->read_depth) {
 		ret = 0;
+	}
 
-	if (ret) {
+	if (ret)
 		rwlock->read_depth++;
-		rwlock_acquire_read(&rwlock->dep_map, 0, 1, _RET_IP_);
-	} else
+	else
 		migrate_enable();
 
 	return ret;
@@ -242,13 +244,13 @@ void __lockfunc rt_read_lock(rwlock_t *rwlock)
 {
 	struct rt_mutex *lock = &rwlock->lock;
 
-	rwlock_acquire_read(&rwlock->dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_);
-
 	/*
 	 * recursive read locks succeed when current owns the lock
 	 */
-	if (rt_mutex_owner(lock) != current)
+	if (rt_mutex_owner(lock) != current) {
+		rwlock_acquire(&rwlock->dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_);
 		__rt_spin_lock(lock);
+	}
 	rwlock->read_depth++;
 }
 
@@ -264,11 +266,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(rt_write_unlock);
 
 void __lockfunc rt_read_unlock(rwlock_t *rwlock)
 {
-	rwlock_release(&rwlock->dep_map, 1, _RET_IP_);
-
 	/* Release the lock only when read_depth is down to 0 */
-	if (--rwlock->read_depth == 0)
+	if (--rwlock->read_depth == 0) {
+		rwlock_release(&rwlock->dep_map, 1, _RET_IP_);
 		__rt_spin_unlock(&rwlock->lock);
+	}
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(rt_read_unlock);
 
@@ -315,9 +317,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(rt_up_write);
 
 void  rt_up_read(struct rw_semaphore *rwsem)
 {
-	rwsem_release(&rwsem->dep_map, 1, _RET_IP_);
-	if (--rwsem->read_depth == 0)
+	if (--rwsem->read_depth == 0) {
+		rwsem_release(&rwsem->dep_map, 1, _RET_IP_);
 		rt_mutex_unlock(&rwsem->lock);
+	}
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(rt_up_read);
 
@@ -366,15 +369,16 @@ int  rt_down_read_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *rwsem)
 	 * but not when read_depth == 0 which means that the rwsem is
 	 * write locked.
 	 */
-	if (rt_mutex_owner(lock) != current)
+	if (rt_mutex_owner(lock) != current) {
 		ret = rt_mutex_trylock(&rwsem->lock);
-	else if (!rwsem->read_depth)
+		if (ret)
+			rwsem_acquire(&rwsem->dep_map, 0, 1, _RET_IP_);
+	} else if (!rwsem->read_depth) {
 		ret = 0;
+	}
 
-	if (ret) {
+	if (ret)
 		rwsem->read_depth++;
-		rwsem_acquire(&rwsem->dep_map, 0, 1, _RET_IP_);
-	}
 	return ret;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(rt_down_read_trylock);
@@ -383,10 +387,10 @@ static void __rt_down_read(struct rw_semaphore *rwsem, int subclass)
 {
 	struct rt_mutex *lock = &rwsem->lock;
 
-	rwsem_acquire_read(&rwsem->dep_map, subclass, 0, _RET_IP_);

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-10-10 13:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-10 13:34 [PATCH RT 0/8] [ANNOUNCE] 3.4.13-rt22-rc1 stable review Steven Rostedt
2012-10-10 13:34 ` [PATCH RT 1/8] random: Make it work on rt Steven Rostedt
2012-10-10 13:34 ` [PATCH RT 2/8] softirq: Init softirq local lock after per cpu section is set up Steven Rostedt
2012-10-10 13:34 ` [PATCH RT 3/8] mm: slab: Fix potential deadlock Steven Rostedt
2012-10-10 13:34 ` [PATCH RT 4/8] mm: page_alloc: Use local_lock_on() instead of plain spinlock Steven Rostedt
2012-10-10 13:34 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2012-10-10 13:34 ` [PATCH RT 6/8] sched: Better debug output for might sleep Steven Rostedt
2012-10-10 13:34 ` [PATCH RT 7/8] stomp_machine: Use mutex_trylock when called from inactive cpu Steven Rostedt
2012-10-10 13:34 ` [PATCH RT 8/8] Linux 3.4.13-rt22-rc1 Steven Rostedt
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-10-12  1:20 [PATCH RT 0/8] [ANNOUNCE] 3.2.31-rt47-rc1 stable review Steven Rostedt
2012-10-12  1:20 ` [PATCH RT 5/8] rt: rwsem/rwlock: lockdep annotations Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121010133523.682693439@goodmis.org \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=C.Emde@osadl.org \
    --cc=jkacur@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).