linux-rt-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Crap, ksoftirqd/0 looping forever in softirq
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 11:34:14 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121011153413.GB22583@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121011142130.GA22583@windriver.com>

[Re: Crap, ksoftirqd/0 looping forever in softirq] On 11/10/2012 (Thu 10:21) Paul Gortmaker wrote:

> [Crap, ksoftirqd/0 looping forever in softirq] On 10/10/2012 (Wed 20:16) Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> 
> > Seeing the above message, I added a trivial change to print out the
> > Mask and Pending, and I consistently saw it was (both p/m) in every
> > case `was __IRQF_TIMER (0x200).
> 
> Of cource it helps if I look up the value in the right list.
> I guess the ffs had me thinking "bits", instead of looking up
> the value in the softirq enum list.
> 
> When I add a change to record the last vecs used and dump them
> out when the Crap message is triggered (using softirq_to_name
> instead of looking things up in random tables!)  I get this:
> 
> [   20.887137] Crap, ksoftirqd/0 looping forever in softirq
> [   20.887150] Last: RCU RCU RCU RCU RCU RCU RCU RCU RCU RCU RCU RCU RCU RCU RCU RCU RCU RCU RCU
> [   20.920168] Crap, ksoftirqd/0 looping forever in softirq
> [   20.920179] Last: RCU RCU RCU RCU RCU RCU RCU RCU RCU RCU RCU RCU RCU RCU RCU RCU RCU RCU RCU
> [   20.954200] Crap, ksoftirqd/0 looping forever in softirq
> [   20.954213] Last: RCU RCU RCU RCU RCU RCU RCU RCU RCU RCU RCU RCU RCU RCU RCU RCU RCU RCU RCU

Here is a trace, which I think shows us that we call the
RCU softirq, which eventually calls invoke_rcu_core, which
is just "raise_softirq(RCU_SOFTIRQ);" so the loop which is
testing on current->softirqs_raised will never see it zero.

We clear it on entry with:
	 current->softirqs_raised &= ~mask;
but after we call:
	 do_single_softirq(i, need_rcu_bh_qs);
it will be re-armed by invoke_rcu_core.

  0xffffffff81044d9d in __raise_softirq_irqoff (nr=9) at kernel/softirq.c:608
  0xffffffff81044e29 in raise_softirq_irqoff (nr=<optimized out>) at kernel/softirq.c:618
  0xffffffff810452e1 in raise_softirq (nr=<optimized out>) at kernel/softirq.c:744
  0xffffffff810bd4e1 in invoke_rcu_core () at kernel/rcutree.c:1878
  rcu_do_batch (rdp=0xffff880017c0bf80, rsp=<optimized out>) at kernel/rcutree.c:1635
  invoke_rcu_callbacks (rdp=0xffff880017c0bf80, rsp=0xffffffff81c2b140) at kernel/rcutree.c:1870
  __rcu_process_callbacks (rsp=0xffffffff81c2b140) at kernel/rcutree.c:1842
  rcu_process_callbacks (unused=<optimized out>) at kernel/rcutree.c:1854
  0xffffffff8104466b in handle_softirq (need_rcu_bh_qs=1, cpu=0, vec_nr=9) at kernel/softirq.c:149
  do_single_softirq (need_rcu_bh_qs=1, which=9) at kernel/softirq.c:457
  do_current_softirqs (need_rcu_bh_qs=1) at kernel/softirq.c:500

Does that sound right?

Paul.

  reply	other threads:[~2012-10-11 15:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-11  0:16 Crap, ksoftirqd/0 looping forever in softirq Paul Gortmaker
2012-10-11  2:38 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-10-11 14:21 ` Paul Gortmaker
2012-10-11 15:34   ` Paul Gortmaker [this message]
2012-10-15 13:36     ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121011153413.GB22583@windriver.com \
    --to=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).