From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
Cc: linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
Gregoire Gentil <gregoire@gentil.com>
Subject: Re: cpufreq + PREEMPT_RT_FULL give bad context sleeping BUG
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 21:51:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130326205107.GB14220@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <514DE3BF.5010800@gentil.com>
* Gregoire Gentil | 2013-03-23 10:17:51 [-0700]:
>Hello,
Hi,
>On OMAP + 3.4 + rt patches with CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL
>CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_ONDEMAND, I get a lot of those cpufreq-related
>bugs:
>
>http://pastebin.com/csy9y3xk
>
>BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/rtmutex.c:646
>(__might_sleep+0x124/0x144) from (rt_spin_lock+0x30/0x64)
>(rt_spin_lock+0x30/0x64) from (clk_get_rate+0x30/0x54)
>(clk_get_rate+0x30/0x54) from (twd_update_frequency+0x20/0x58)
Here it tries to grab a mutex
>(twd_update_frequency+0x20/0x58) from (smp_call_function_single+0xd0/0x1c4)
>(smp_call_function_single+0xd0/0x1c4) from
Here it calls a smp functions which runs with interupts off.
>(twd_cpufreq_transition+0x34/0x40)
that means it should trigger on mainline as well.
>Any idea what I should do to fix this problem?
This has been introduced in 4fd7f9b12 ("ARM: 7212/1: smp_twd: reconfigure
clockevents after cpufreq change"). I think that omap got later
converted to the generic clk framework which uses now the mutex. Could
somebody please look at this?
>Grégoire
Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-26 20:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-22 22:10 [ANNOUNCE] 3.8.4-rt1 Thomas Gleixner
2013-03-23 1:30 ` Luis Claudio R. Goncalves
2013-03-23 17:17 ` cpufreq + PREEMPT_RT_FULL give bad context sleeping BUG Gregoire Gentil
2013-03-26 20:51 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2013-03-26 21:07 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-03-26 21:33 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-03-26 21:38 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-03-26 21:44 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-03-27 15:23 ` Gregoire Gentil
2013-04-25 15:23 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-03-23 18:38 ` [ANNOUNCE] 3.8.4-rt1 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-03-24 1:15 ` Luis Claudio R. Goncalves
2013-03-23 3:31 ` Luis Claudio R. Goncalves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130326205107.GB14220@linutronix.de \
--to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=gregoire@gentil.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
--cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).