From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RT v2] x86/mce: Defer mce wakeups to threads for
 PREEMPT_RT
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 10:41:37 +0200
Message-ID: <20130426084137.GC20927@linutronix.de>
References: <1365705214.9609.58.camel@gandalf.local.home>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	RT <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Clark Williams <clark@redhat.com>,
	John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@linux.intel.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1365705214.9609.58.camel@gandalf.local.home>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-rt-users.vger.kernel.org

* Steven Rostedt | 2013-04-11 14:33:34 [-0400]:

>As wait queue locks are notorious for long hold times, we can not
>convert them to raw_spin_locks without causing issues with -rt. But
>Thomas has created a "simple-wait" structure that uses raw spin locks
>which may have been a good fit.
>
>Unfortunately, wait queues are not the only issue, as the mce_notify_irq
>also does a schedule_work(), which grabs the workqueue spin locks that
>have the exact same issue.

mce_notify_irq() can use simple_waitqueue, no?
The other issue is that mce_report_event() is scheduling a per-cpu
workqueue (mce_schedule_work) in case of a memory fault. This has the
same issue.

Sebastian