From: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: tj@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, airlied@redhat.com,
axboe@kernel.dk, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
mingo@redhat.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
robin.randhawa@arm.com, Steve.Bannister@arm.com, Livi@jasper.es
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 0/5] Queue work on power efficient wq
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 20:55:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130708185509.GH29556@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKohpokT3M5TNhzGxCwHZoFU69VkFutQ-KBCf5Xh5Vfwb+trzg@mail.gmail.com>
Hello,
On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 10:18:08PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 8 July 2013 21:27, Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 09:17:01PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>
> >> Well, big LITTLE still runs an SMP kernel :) and so has this flag set.
> > The 'S' is justified because cpu0 and cpu1 are of the same type? Are
> > there b.L systems that have only one big and one LITTLE cpu? Do these
> > use SMP, too?
>
> Following definition of SMP says:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symmetric_Multiprocessor
>
> A system is SMP when:
> - It has same type of cores
> - controlled by a single instance of OS.
>
> In big LITTLE first one is obviously not completely true as you pointed out.
> But second one is and so I would say its an SMP system :)
>
> Don't know how it should be called though.
MP maybe.
> >> You can make it dependent on that if required.
> > Well, it's not required. It's just that the corresponding question in
> > make oldconfig isn't really an enrichment for a kernel targeting an
> > Cortex M3 :-)
>
> Just to make it clear enough, you are saying it doesn't make any
> sense to enable it for M3? But because it is disabled by default,
> the problem is not seen?
No I'm saying that asking me is bad because on an UP machine it won't
matter what I answer. So please don't ask me if SMP is off.
> Why? Can't we have two M3's on a SoC and run an SMP kernel over
> it?
Yeah, you can. Then you'd have SMP (or MP) enabled though and the choice
for that workqueue thing makes a difference. In that case asking is OK.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-08 18:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-24 11:42 [PATCH V5 0/5] Queue work on power efficient wq Viresh Kumar
2013-04-24 11:42 ` [PATCH V5 1/5] workqueues: Introduce new flag WQ_POWER_EFFICIENT for power oriented workqueues Viresh Kumar
2013-04-24 12:20 ` Amit Kucheria
2013-04-24 12:27 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-04-24 16:12 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <CAP245DUGuaSQbP4026N8kgn6-NqXFJWR3zKoYud=HQ_b+v5+Xw@mail.gmail.com>
2013-04-25 3:43 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-04-25 11:13 ` Amit Kucheria
2013-04-25 11:15 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-04-26 19:11 ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-29 6:36 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-04-29 16:19 ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-29 16:42 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-05-13 8:29 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-05-14 17:55 ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-24 11:42 ` [PATCH V5 2/5] workqueue: Add system wide power_efficient workqueues Viresh Kumar
2013-05-14 17:56 ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-24 11:42 ` [PATCH V5 3/5] PHYLIB: queue work on system_power_efficient_wq Viresh Kumar
2013-04-24 11:42 ` [PATCH V5 4/5] block: queue work on power efficient wq Viresh Kumar
2013-05-14 17:57 ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-24 11:42 ` [PATCH V5 5/5] fbcon: " Viresh Kumar
2013-05-14 17:57 ` Tejun Heo
2013-05-14 17:54 ` [PATCH V5 0/5] Queue " Tejun Heo
2013-05-15 5:48 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-07-08 15:37 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2013-07-08 15:47 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-07-08 15:57 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2013-07-08 16:48 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-07-08 18:55 ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130708185509.GH29556@pengutronix.de \
--to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=Livi@jasper.es \
--cc=Steve.Bannister@arm.com \
--cc=airlied@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=robin.randhawa@arm.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).