linux-rt-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: tj@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, airlied@redhat.com,
	axboe@kernel.dk, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
	mingo@redhat.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	robin.randhawa@arm.com, Steve.Bannister@arm.com, Livi@jasper.es
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 0/5] Queue work on power efficient wq
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 20:55:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130708185509.GH29556@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKohpokT3M5TNhzGxCwHZoFU69VkFutQ-KBCf5Xh5Vfwb+trzg@mail.gmail.com>

Hello,

On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 10:18:08PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 8 July 2013 21:27, Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 09:17:01PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> 
> >> Well, big LITTLE still runs an SMP kernel :) and so has this flag set.
> > The 'S' is justified because cpu0 and cpu1 are of the same type? Are
> > there b.L systems that have only one big and one LITTLE cpu? Do these
> > use SMP, too?
> 
> Following definition of SMP says:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symmetric_Multiprocessor
> 
> A system is SMP when:
> - It has same type of cores
> - controlled by a single instance of OS.
> 
> In big LITTLE first one is obviously not completely true as you pointed out.
> But second one is and so I would say its an SMP system :)
> 
> Don't know how it should be called though.
MP maybe.

> >> You can make it dependent on that if required.
> > Well, it's not required. It's just that the corresponding question in
> > make oldconfig isn't really an enrichment for a kernel targeting an
> > Cortex M3 :-)
> 
> Just to make it clear enough, you are saying it doesn't make any
> sense to enable it for M3? But because it is disabled by default,
> the problem is not seen?
No I'm saying that asking me is bad because on an UP machine it won't
matter what I answer. So please don't ask me if SMP is off.

> Why? Can't we have two M3's on a SoC and run an SMP kernel over
> it?
Yeah, you can. Then you'd have SMP (or MP) enabled though and the choice
for that workqueue thing makes a difference. In that case asking is OK.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

      reply	other threads:[~2013-07-08 18:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-24 11:42 [PATCH V5 0/5] Queue work on power efficient wq Viresh Kumar
2013-04-24 11:42 ` [PATCH V5 1/5] workqueues: Introduce new flag WQ_POWER_EFFICIENT for power oriented workqueues Viresh Kumar
2013-04-24 12:20   ` Amit Kucheria
2013-04-24 12:27     ` Viresh Kumar
2013-04-24 16:12       ` Tejun Heo
     [not found]         ` <CAP245DUGuaSQbP4026N8kgn6-NqXFJWR3zKoYud=HQ_b+v5+Xw@mail.gmail.com>
2013-04-25  3:43           ` Viresh Kumar
2013-04-25 11:13             ` Amit Kucheria
2013-04-25 11:15               ` Viresh Kumar
2013-04-26 19:11             ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-29  6:36               ` Viresh Kumar
2013-04-29 16:19                 ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-29 16:42                   ` Viresh Kumar
2013-05-13  8:29               ` Viresh Kumar
2013-05-14 17:55                 ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-24 11:42 ` [PATCH V5 2/5] workqueue: Add system wide power_efficient workqueues Viresh Kumar
2013-05-14 17:56   ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-24 11:42 ` [PATCH V5 3/5] PHYLIB: queue work on system_power_efficient_wq Viresh Kumar
2013-04-24 11:42 ` [PATCH V5 4/5] block: queue work on power efficient wq Viresh Kumar
2013-05-14 17:57   ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-24 11:42 ` [PATCH V5 5/5] fbcon: " Viresh Kumar
2013-05-14 17:57   ` Tejun Heo
2013-05-14 17:54 ` [PATCH V5 0/5] Queue " Tejun Heo
2013-05-15  5:48   ` Viresh Kumar
2013-07-08 15:37 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2013-07-08 15:47   ` Viresh Kumar
2013-07-08 15:57     ` Uwe Kleine-König
2013-07-08 16:48       ` Viresh Kumar
2013-07-08 18:55         ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130708185509.GH29556@pengutronix.de \
    --to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=Livi@jasper.es \
    --cc=Steve.Bannister@arm.com \
    --cc=airlied@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=robin.randhawa@arm.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).