linux-rt-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Carsten Emde <C.Emde@osadl.org>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Clark Williams <clark.williams@gmail.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH RT 6/6] vtime: Convert vtime_seqlock into raw_spinlock_t and seqcount combo
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 13:12:13 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130710171212.GA13553@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130626193050.529670718@goodmis.org>

[[RFC][PATCH RT 6/6] vtime: Convert vtime_seqlock into raw_spinlock_t and seqcount combo] On 26/06/2013 (Wed 15:28) Steven Rostedt wrote:

> The vtime seqlock needs to be taken in true interrupt context on -rt.
> The normal seqlocks are converted to mutexes when PREEMPT_RT_FULL is
> enabled, which will break the vtime code as the calls are done from
> interrupt context.
> 
> Convert the vtime seqlock into the raw_spinlock_t and seqcount combo
> that can be done in interrupt context.

Alternatively, we could revive the raw seqlock patch from Thomas?

https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/2/17/238

Below is a version updating it to 3.8.x-RT.  One downside is that
current mainline kernels have raw_seqcount_begin() function, which has
nothing to do with preempt-rt, so the seqcount function namespace can
get confusing unless we rename raw_seqcount_begin to something that
doesn't sound RT-ish.

Paul.
--

diff --git a/include/linux/seqlock.h b/include/linux/seqlock.h
index 939ea1a..5a3f6fd 100644
--- a/include/linux/seqlock.h
+++ b/include/linux/seqlock.h
@@ -185,6 +185,11 @@ static inline void write_seqcount_barrier(seqcount_t *s)
 
 typedef struct {
 	struct seqcount seqcount;
+	raw_spinlock_t lock;
+} raw_seqlock_t;
+
+typedef struct {
+	struct seqcount seqcount;
 	spinlock_t lock;
 } seqlock_t;
 
@@ -192,6 +197,21 @@ typedef struct {
  * These macros triggered gcc-3.x compile-time problems.  We think these are
  * OK now.  Be cautious.
  */
+#define __RAW_SEQLOCK_UNLOCKED(lockname)			\
+	{							\
+		.seqcount = SEQCNT_ZERO,			\
+		.lock =	__RAW_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(lockname)	\
+	}
+
+#define raw_seqlock_init(x)					\
+	do {							\
+		seqcount_init(&(x)->seqcount);			\
+		raw_spin_lock_init(&(x)->lock);			\
+	} while (0)
+
+#define DEFINE_RAW_SEQLOCK(x) \
+		raw_seqlock_t x = __RAW_SEQLOCK_UNLOCKED(x)
+
 #define __SEQLOCK_UNLOCKED(lockname)			\
 	{						\
 		.seqcount = SEQCNT_ZERO,		\
@@ -210,6 +230,11 @@ typedef struct {
 /*
  * Read side functions for starting and finalizing a read side section.
  */
+static inline unsigned read_raw_seqbegin(const raw_seqlock_t *sl)
+{
+	return read_seqcount_begin(&sl->seqcount);
+}
+
 #ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL
 static inline unsigned read_seqbegin(const seqlock_t *sl)
 {
@@ -238,6 +263,11 @@ repeat:
 }
 #endif
 
+static inline unsigned read_raw_seqretry(const raw_seqlock_t *sl, unsigned start)
+{
+	return read_seqcount_retry(&sl->seqcount, start);
+}
+
 static inline unsigned read_seqretry(const seqlock_t *sl, unsigned start)
 {
 	return read_seqcount_retry(&sl->seqcount, start);
@@ -248,6 +278,64 @@ static inline unsigned read_seqretry(const seqlock_t *sl, unsigned start)
  * Acts like a normal spin_lock/unlock.
  * Don't need preempt_disable() because that is in the spin_lock already.
  */
+static inline void write_raw_seqlock(raw_seqlock_t *sl)
+{
+	raw_spin_lock(&sl->lock);
+	__write_seqcount_begin(&sl->seqcount);
+}
+
+static inline void write_raw_sequnlock(raw_seqlock_t *sl)
+{
+	__write_seqcount_end(&sl->seqcount);
+	raw_spin_unlock(&sl->lock);
+}
+
+static inline void write_raw_seqlock_bh(raw_seqlock_t *sl)
+{
+	raw_spin_lock_bh(&sl->lock);
+	__write_seqcount_begin(&sl->seqcount);
+}
+
+static inline void write_raw_sequnlock_bh(raw_seqlock_t *sl)
+{
+	__write_seqcount_end(&sl->seqcount);
+	raw_spin_unlock_bh(&sl->lock);
+}
+
+static inline void write_raw_seqlock_irq(raw_seqlock_t *sl)
+{
+	raw_spin_lock_irq(&sl->lock);
+	__write_seqcount_begin(&sl->seqcount);
+}
+
+static inline void write_raw_sequnlock_irq(raw_seqlock_t *sl)
+{
+	__write_seqcount_end(&sl->seqcount);
+	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&sl->lock);
+}
+
+static inline unsigned long __write_raw_seqlock_irqsave(raw_seqlock_t *sl)
+{
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&sl->lock, flags);
+	__write_seqcount_begin(&sl->seqcount);
+	return flags;
+}
+
+#define write_raw_seqlock_irqsave(lock, flags)				\
+	do { flags = __write_raw_seqlock_irqsave(lock); } while (0)
+
+static inline void
+write_raw_sequnlock_irqrestore(raw_seqlock_t *sl, unsigned long flags)
+{
+	__write_seqcount_end(&sl->seqcount);
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sl->lock, flags);
+}
+
+/*
+ * non raw versions
+ */
 static inline void write_seqlock(seqlock_t *sl)
 {
 	spin_lock(&sl->lock);

  reply	other threads:[~2013-07-10 17:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-26 19:28 [RFC][PATCH RT 0/6] rt: Updates to handle some 3.10 changes Steven Rostedt
2013-06-26 19:28 ` [RFC][PATCH RT 1/6] rt,rcu: Have rcu_read_lock_sched() use locks for PREEMPT_RT Steven Rostedt
2013-06-26 20:53   ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-06-26 21:32     ` Steven Rostedt
2013-06-27  3:52   ` Mike Galbraith
2013-06-27 11:28     ` Steven Rostedt
2013-06-26 19:28 ` [RFC][PATCH RT 2/6] workqueue: Use rcu_read_lock_sched() to denote RCU synchronize_sched() location Steven Rostedt
2013-06-26 19:28 ` [RFC][PATCH RT 3/6] idr: Use migrate_disable() to stay on the current CPU Steven Rostedt
2013-06-26 19:28 ` [RFC][PATCH RT 4/6] rt,workqueue: Add local_lock_irq() call to put_pwq_unlocked() Steven Rostedt
2013-06-26 19:28 ` [RFC][PATCH RT 5/6] rt,ntp: Move call to schedule_delayed_work() to helper thread Steven Rostedt
2013-06-26 19:28 ` [RFC][PATCH RT 6/6] vtime: Convert vtime_seqlock into raw_spinlock_t and seqcount combo Steven Rostedt
2013-07-10 17:12   ` Paul Gortmaker [this message]
2013-07-11 14:30     ` Steven Rostedt
2013-06-26 19:43 ` [RFC][PATCH RT 0.5/6] locallock: Add include of percpu.h Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130710171212.GA13553@windriver.com \
    --to=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
    --cc=C.Emde@osadl.org \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=clark.williams@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).