From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Carsten Emde <C.Emde@osadl.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Clark Williams <clark.williams@gmail.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH RT 6/6] vtime: Convert vtime_seqlock into raw_spinlock_t and seqcount combo
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 13:12:13 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130710171212.GA13553@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130626193050.529670718@goodmis.org>
[[RFC][PATCH RT 6/6] vtime: Convert vtime_seqlock into raw_spinlock_t and seqcount combo] On 26/06/2013 (Wed 15:28) Steven Rostedt wrote:
> The vtime seqlock needs to be taken in true interrupt context on -rt.
> The normal seqlocks are converted to mutexes when PREEMPT_RT_FULL is
> enabled, which will break the vtime code as the calls are done from
> interrupt context.
>
> Convert the vtime seqlock into the raw_spinlock_t and seqcount combo
> that can be done in interrupt context.
Alternatively, we could revive the raw seqlock patch from Thomas?
https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/2/17/238
Below is a version updating it to 3.8.x-RT. One downside is that
current mainline kernels have raw_seqcount_begin() function, which has
nothing to do with preempt-rt, so the seqcount function namespace can
get confusing unless we rename raw_seqcount_begin to something that
doesn't sound RT-ish.
Paul.
--
diff --git a/include/linux/seqlock.h b/include/linux/seqlock.h
index 939ea1a..5a3f6fd 100644
--- a/include/linux/seqlock.h
+++ b/include/linux/seqlock.h
@@ -185,6 +185,11 @@ static inline void write_seqcount_barrier(seqcount_t *s)
typedef struct {
struct seqcount seqcount;
+ raw_spinlock_t lock;
+} raw_seqlock_t;
+
+typedef struct {
+ struct seqcount seqcount;
spinlock_t lock;
} seqlock_t;
@@ -192,6 +197,21 @@ typedef struct {
* These macros triggered gcc-3.x compile-time problems. We think these are
* OK now. Be cautious.
*/
+#define __RAW_SEQLOCK_UNLOCKED(lockname) \
+ { \
+ .seqcount = SEQCNT_ZERO, \
+ .lock = __RAW_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(lockname) \
+ }
+
+#define raw_seqlock_init(x) \
+ do { \
+ seqcount_init(&(x)->seqcount); \
+ raw_spin_lock_init(&(x)->lock); \
+ } while (0)
+
+#define DEFINE_RAW_SEQLOCK(x) \
+ raw_seqlock_t x = __RAW_SEQLOCK_UNLOCKED(x)
+
#define __SEQLOCK_UNLOCKED(lockname) \
{ \
.seqcount = SEQCNT_ZERO, \
@@ -210,6 +230,11 @@ typedef struct {
/*
* Read side functions for starting and finalizing a read side section.
*/
+static inline unsigned read_raw_seqbegin(const raw_seqlock_t *sl)
+{
+ return read_seqcount_begin(&sl->seqcount);
+}
+
#ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL
static inline unsigned read_seqbegin(const seqlock_t *sl)
{
@@ -238,6 +263,11 @@ repeat:
}
#endif
+static inline unsigned read_raw_seqretry(const raw_seqlock_t *sl, unsigned start)
+{
+ return read_seqcount_retry(&sl->seqcount, start);
+}
+
static inline unsigned read_seqretry(const seqlock_t *sl, unsigned start)
{
return read_seqcount_retry(&sl->seqcount, start);
@@ -248,6 +278,64 @@ static inline unsigned read_seqretry(const seqlock_t *sl, unsigned start)
* Acts like a normal spin_lock/unlock.
* Don't need preempt_disable() because that is in the spin_lock already.
*/
+static inline void write_raw_seqlock(raw_seqlock_t *sl)
+{
+ raw_spin_lock(&sl->lock);
+ __write_seqcount_begin(&sl->seqcount);
+}
+
+static inline void write_raw_sequnlock(raw_seqlock_t *sl)
+{
+ __write_seqcount_end(&sl->seqcount);
+ raw_spin_unlock(&sl->lock);
+}
+
+static inline void write_raw_seqlock_bh(raw_seqlock_t *sl)
+{
+ raw_spin_lock_bh(&sl->lock);
+ __write_seqcount_begin(&sl->seqcount);
+}
+
+static inline void write_raw_sequnlock_bh(raw_seqlock_t *sl)
+{
+ __write_seqcount_end(&sl->seqcount);
+ raw_spin_unlock_bh(&sl->lock);
+}
+
+static inline void write_raw_seqlock_irq(raw_seqlock_t *sl)
+{
+ raw_spin_lock_irq(&sl->lock);
+ __write_seqcount_begin(&sl->seqcount);
+}
+
+static inline void write_raw_sequnlock_irq(raw_seqlock_t *sl)
+{
+ __write_seqcount_end(&sl->seqcount);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irq(&sl->lock);
+}
+
+static inline unsigned long __write_raw_seqlock_irqsave(raw_seqlock_t *sl)
+{
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&sl->lock, flags);
+ __write_seqcount_begin(&sl->seqcount);
+ return flags;
+}
+
+#define write_raw_seqlock_irqsave(lock, flags) \
+ do { flags = __write_raw_seqlock_irqsave(lock); } while (0)
+
+static inline void
+write_raw_sequnlock_irqrestore(raw_seqlock_t *sl, unsigned long flags)
+{
+ __write_seqcount_end(&sl->seqcount);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sl->lock, flags);
+}
+
+/*
+ * non raw versions
+ */
static inline void write_seqlock(seqlock_t *sl)
{
spin_lock(&sl->lock);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-10 17:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-26 19:28 [RFC][PATCH RT 0/6] rt: Updates to handle some 3.10 changes Steven Rostedt
2013-06-26 19:28 ` [RFC][PATCH RT 1/6] rt,rcu: Have rcu_read_lock_sched() use locks for PREEMPT_RT Steven Rostedt
2013-06-26 20:53 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-06-26 21:32 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-06-27 3:52 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-06-27 11:28 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-06-26 19:28 ` [RFC][PATCH RT 2/6] workqueue: Use rcu_read_lock_sched() to denote RCU synchronize_sched() location Steven Rostedt
2013-06-26 19:28 ` [RFC][PATCH RT 3/6] idr: Use migrate_disable() to stay on the current CPU Steven Rostedt
2013-06-26 19:28 ` [RFC][PATCH RT 4/6] rt,workqueue: Add local_lock_irq() call to put_pwq_unlocked() Steven Rostedt
2013-06-26 19:28 ` [RFC][PATCH RT 5/6] rt,ntp: Move call to schedule_delayed_work() to helper thread Steven Rostedt
2013-06-26 19:28 ` [RFC][PATCH RT 6/6] vtime: Convert vtime_seqlock into raw_spinlock_t and seqcount combo Steven Rostedt
2013-07-10 17:12 ` Paul Gortmaker [this message]
2013-07-11 14:30 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-06-26 19:43 ` [RFC][PATCH RT 0.5/6] locallock: Add include of percpu.h Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130710171212.GA13553@windriver.com \
--to=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=C.Emde@osadl.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=clark.williams@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).