From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Alexander Fyodorov <halcy@yandex.ru>
Cc: "linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org" <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rt] Fix races in ptrace
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 18:33:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130829163300.GC15360@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <96171377181398@web13h.yandex.ru>
* Alexander Fyodorov | 2013-08-22 18:23:18 [+0400]:
>This was the first thing I tried but it did not work. ptrace_check_attach() passes TASK_TRACED to wait_task_inactive() which tests for equality:
>
>unsigned long wait_task_inactive(struct task_struct *p, long match_state)
>< ... >
> if (match_state && unlikely(p->state != match_state)
> && unlikely(p->saved_state != match_state)) {
>
>But this test will fail because we've added TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE and possibly removed some other bits from p->state. So I decided to add pi_lock locking instead - it is slower but it works with 100% guarantee.
>
>Also adding __TASK_TRACED does not help with all the other places where saved_state is checked and more races might still be hidden.
I'm tempted to add this:
---
include/linux/sched.h | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index e0a05de..bd60b9d 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -175,7 +175,6 @@ extern char ___assert_task_state[1 - 2*!!(
TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE | __TASK_STOPPED | \
__TASK_TRACED)
-#define task_is_traced(task) ((task->state & __TASK_TRACED) != 0)
#define task_is_stopped(task) ((task->state & __TASK_STOPPED) != 0)
#define task_is_dead(task) ((task)->exit_state != 0)
#define task_is_stopped_or_traced(task) \
@@ -2532,6 +2531,24 @@ static inline int signal_pending_state(long state, struct task_struct *p)
return (state & TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE) || __fatal_signal_pending(p);
}
+static inline bool task_is_traced(struct task_struct *task)
+{
+ bool traced = false;
+
+ if (task->state & __TASK_TRACED)
+ return true;
+#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL
+ /* in case the task is sleeping on tasklist_lock */
+ raw_spin_lock_irq(&task->pi_lock);
+ if (task->state & __TASK_TRACED)
+ traced = true;
+ else if (task->saved_state & __TASK_TRACED)
+ traced = true;
+ raw_spin_unlock_irq(&task->pi_lock);
+#endif
+ return traced;
+}
+
/*
* cond_resched() and cond_resched_lock(): latency reduction via
* explicit rescheduling in places that are safe. The return
to the next v3.10-rt release. I tested this with:
--- cat ptrace-test.c ---
#include <unistd.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <signal.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <sys/ptrace.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/wait.h>
#include <sys/time.h>
#include <sys/resource.h>
#define NUM_CHILD 5
#define LOCK_CHILD 3
static pid_t pids[NUM_CHILD];
static void play(void)
{
pid_t pid;
int ret;
pid = getpid();
fprintf(stderr, "%s(%d) ready\n", __func__, pid);
ret = ptrace(PTRACE_TRACEME, 0, NULL, 0);
if (ret) {
fprintf(stderr, "ERR %d: %m\n", pid);
return;
}
do {
kill(pid, SIGUSR1);
} while (1);
}
static void kill_kids(void)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i < NUM_CHILD; i++) {
if (pids[i])
kill(pids[i], SIGKILL);
}
}
static void get_prio_fork(void)
{
pid_t pid;
int i;
pid = fork();
if (pid < 0) {
fprintf(stderr, "fork(): %m\n");
exit(1);
}
if (pid)
return;
do {
for (i = 0; i < NUM_CHILD; i++) {
int ret;
ret = getpriority(PRIO_PROCESS, pids[i]);
if (ret < 0) {
printf("=> %m %d\n", pids[i]);
exit(1);
}
}
} while(1);
exit(0);
}
int main(void)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i < NUM_CHILD; i++) {
pid_t pid;
pid = fork();
if (pid < 0) {
fprintf(stderr, "Fork error: %m\n");
kill_kids();
exit(1);
}
if (pid == 0) {
play();
exit(0);
}
pids[i] = pid;
}
for (i = 0; i < LOCK_CHILD; i++)
get_prio_fork();
do {
for (i = 0; i < NUM_CHILD; i++) {
int ret;
ret = waitpid(pids[i], NULL, 0);
if (ret < 0) {
fprintf(stderr, "%s(2) %d / %d %m\n", __func__,
pids[i], ret);
exit(1);
}
ret = ptrace(PTRACE_CONT, pids[i], NULL, 0);
if (ret) {
fprintf(stderr, "%s(3) %d / %d %m\n", __func__,
pids[i], ret);
ret = kill(pids[i], 0);
if (!ret)
fprintf(stderr, "process is available\n");
exit(1);
}
}
} while(1);
return 0;
}
--- cat end ---
and it seems to work. Any comments?
Sebastian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-29 16:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-24 16:23 [PATCH rt] Fix races in ptrace Alexander Fyodorov
2013-08-12 16:41 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-08-12 21:13 ` Alexander Fyodorov
2013-08-21 17:24 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-08-22 14:23 ` Alexander Fyodorov
2013-08-29 16:33 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2013-08-29 17:26 ` Alexander Fyodorov
2013-08-29 18:28 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-08-29 18:47 ` Alexander Fyodorov
2013-08-29 18:49 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-11-30 20:07 ` [PATCH v2] ptrace: fix ptrace vs tasklist_lock race Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130829163300.GC15360@linutronix.de \
--to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=halcy@yandex.ru \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).