From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Subject: Re: 3.10.9-rt5 with Atmel AT91SAM9G25 SoC triggers "Trying to free already-free IRQ 1" Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 23:17:21 +0100 Message-ID: <20131108221721.GB13367@linutronix.de> References: <20131011100951.GC6983@linutronix.de> <20131018140346.GA14569@linutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Michael Langfinger , "linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org" To: Sami =?utf-8?Q?Pietik=C3=A4inen?= Return-path: Received: from www.linutronix.de ([62.245.132.108]:33110 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758435Ab3KHWRX convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Nov 2013 17:17:23 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: * Sami Pietik=C3=A4inen | 2013-10-28 13:59:53 [+0000]: >It seems that there is an irq number mismatch in the "arm-at91-pit-rem= ove-irq-handler-when-clock-is-unused.patch". >The patch adds setup_irq() and remove_irq() calls which have different= irq number than the base driver. > >If I'm correct, the irq number should be NR_IRQS_LEGACY + AT91_ID_SYS = instead of only AT91_ID_SYS. > >I have attached a fixed patch for 3.6.9-rt21. I tested it with SAMA5D3= 5, and it removed the=20 >"Trying to free already-free IRQ 1" boot warnings. Michael, any feedback? Does this solve your problem, too? >BR, >Sami Pietik=C3=A4inen Sebastian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-user= s" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html