From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@hofr.at>
Cc: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Andreas Platschek <platschek@ict.tuwien.ac.at>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drop recursive migrate_disable in rt_write_trylock_irqsave
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 18:15:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131122171555.GH8698@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131122044439.GC31849@opentech.at>
* Nicholas Mc Guire | 2013-11-22 05:44:39 [+0100]:
> rt_write_trylock_irqsave unconditionally calls rt_write_trylock which will
> disable migration if the lock was sucessfully acquired.
> This patch drops the recursive migrate_disable/enable in
> rt_write_trylock_irqsave and rt_write_unlock_irq respecttively
>
> No change of functionality
I think you change functionality because you remove code. If you would
cut a big function into two small functions then I would agree that the
functionality has not been changed. But…
>index 9a5fe26..f6c7612 100644
>--- a/include/linux/rwlock_rt.h
>+++ b/include/linux/rwlock_rt.h
>@@ -105,7 +105,6 @@ extern void __rt_rwlock_init(rwlock_t *rwlock, char *name, struct lock_class_key
> typecheck(unsigned long, flags); \
> (void) flags; \
> rt_read_unlock(lock); \
>- migrate_enable(); \
> } while (0)
You are removing that from read_unlock_irqrestore() instead of
write_unlock_irqrestore() which comes next:
>
> #define write_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags) \
>diff --git a/kernel/rt.c b/kernel/rt.c
>index 4b2c4a9..71d26a4 100644
>--- a/kernel/rt.c
>+++ b/kernel/rt.c
>@@ -196,10 +196,8 @@ int __lockfunc rt_write_trylock_irqsave(rwlock_t *rwlock, unsigned long *flags)
> int ret;
>
> *flags = 0;
>- migrate_disable();
> ret = rt_write_trylock(rwlock);
>- if (!ret)
>- migrate_enable();
>+
The amount of users of rt_write_trylock_irqsave() is so small that
nobody noticed this bug:
write_trylock_irqsave()
->rt_write_trylock_irqsave()
-> m_d()
-> rt_write_trylock()
-> m_d()
That means we called migrate_disable() twice. Now comes the unlock path:
write_unlock_irqrestore()
-> rt_write_unlock()
-> m_e()
That means migrations still needs to be enabled.
I would however prefer your optimisation where you remove the pointless
m_e() in rt_write_trylock_irqsave();
> return ret;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(rt_write_trylock_irqsave);
Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-22 17:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-20 10:21 [PATCH 1/2] remove recursive call to migrate_disable in read_lock_bh Nicholas Mc Guire
2013-11-21 10:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-21 11:14 ` Nicholas Mc Guire
2013-11-21 23:58 ` Nicholas Mc Guire
2013-11-22 4:42 ` [PATCH] condition migration_disable on lock acquisition Nicholas Mc Guire
2013-11-22 18:39 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-11-27 0:26 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-11-22 4:44 ` [PATCH] drop recursive migrate_disable in rt_write_trylock_irqsave Nicholas Mc Guire
2013-11-22 17:15 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2013-11-22 5:09 ` [PATCH] drop recursive migrate_disable in rt_write_trylock_irqsave - the right one this time Nicholas Mc Guire
2013-11-22 17:17 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-11-22 16:12 ` [PATCH 1/2] remove recursive call to migrate_disable in read_lock_bh Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-11-22 23:39 ` Nicholas Mc Guire
2013-11-29 14:54 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-11-30 1:58 ` Nicholas Mc Guire
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131122171555.GH8698@linutronix.de \
--to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=der.herr@hofr.at \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=platschek@ict.tuwien.ac.at \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).