linux-rt-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>
To: Stefan Roese <stefan.roese@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: cyclictest better values with system load than without (OMAP3530 target)
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 10:12:32 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131126101232.21636c8f@sluggy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5294681E.10406@gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2654 bytes --]

In my experience (on x86_64 mainly), that behavior (worse times when
not under load) is due to the overhead of coming out of power-save/idle
states. When you've got a big load on the system and all the cores are
active, then the power-save logic and/or the idle logic doesn't kick in
and devices aren't being powered down.

Do you know if your OMAP has power-save logic available? Alternatively
do you know how expensive the idle mechanism is? Have you tried booting
with idle=poll then measuring without a load?

Clark


On Tue, 26 Nov 2013 10:21:34 +0100
Stefan Roese <stefan.roese@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi!
> 
> I'm running cylictest on a OMAP3530 target board and am a bit
> astonished about the results. Especially that the latency values
> are better on a system with system load (hackbench) than on one
> without system load. Here the values I get:
> 
> With system load (hackbench):
> -----------------------------
> # ./cyclictest -l 10000 -i 1000 -n -p 80 -q
> # /dev/cpu_dma_latency set to 0us
> T: 0 ( 1853) P:80 I:1000 C:  10000 Min:     36 Act:  156 Avg:  154 Max:
>     244
> 
> Idle system:
> ------------
> # ./cyclictest -l 10000 -i 1000 -n -p 80 -q
> # /dev/cpu_dma_latency set to 0us
> T: 0 ( 2332) P:80 I:1000 C:  10000 Min:     81 Act:  530 Avg:  484 Max:
>     602
> 
> 
> Some details to my test/system setup:
> - Linux v3.8.13
> - preempt-rt patch 3.8.13-rt14
> - HW: TI OMAP3530 CM_T35 board
> - Latest cyclictest from rt-tests git repository
> 
> 
> I might have misconfigured the system. So here some extracts from
> my .config:
> 
> ...
> CONFIG_TICK_ONESHOT=y
> CONFIG_NO_HZ=y
> CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS=y
> ...
> # CONFIG_CPU_FREQ is not set
> # CONFIG_CPU_IDLE is not set
> # CONFIG_ARCH_NEEDS_CPU_IDLE_COUPLED is not set
> ...
> CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL=y
> ...
> 
> With CONFIG_NO_HZ disabled I get slightly better results:
> 
> With system load (hackbench):
> -----------------------------
> # ./cyclictest -l 10000 -i 1000 -n -p 80 -q
> # /dev/cpu_dma_latency set to 0us
> T: 0 ( 1840) P:80 I:1000 C:  10000 Min:     30 Act:  153 Avg:  154 Max:
>     238
> 
> Idle system:
> -------------
> # ./cyclictest -l 10000 -i 1000 -n -p 80 -q
> # /dev/cpu_dma_latency set to 0us
> T: 0 ( 1371) P:80 I:1000 C:  10000 Min:     40 Act:  465 Avg:  435 Max:
>     502
> 
> 
> Any ideas/explanations are really appreciated.
> 
> Thanks,
> Stefan
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-11-26 16:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-26  9:21 cyclictest better values with system load than without (OMAP3530 target) Stefan Roese
2013-11-26 14:21 ` Dmitry Lysenko
2013-11-26 19:14   ` Stefan Roese
2013-11-26 20:14     ` Tim Sander
2013-11-26 16:12 ` Clark Williams [this message]
2013-11-29 12:56   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-11-29 15:10     ` Carsten Emde
2013-11-29 16:36       ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2013-11-29 16:58         ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2013-11-29 17:36           ` Carsten Emde
2013-11-29 19:34             ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2013-11-29 21:10               ` Carsten Emde

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131126101232.21636c8f@sluggy \
    --to=williams@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stefan.roese@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).