* [PATCH] consolidate spin_lock/unlock waiting with spin_unlock_wait
@ 2013-12-02 4:41 Nicholas Mc Guire
2013-12-15 13:44 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Nicholas Mc Guire @ 2013-12-02 4:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-rt-users; +Cc: Thomas Gleixner, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
>From 19ac7e10b38947dbd8d731a13243fb28490f5ab4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@hofr.at>
Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2013 23:03:52 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] consolidate spin_lock/unlock waiting with spin_unlock_wait
since:
commit c2f21ce2e31286a0a32f8da0a7856e9ca1122ef3
Author: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Date: Wed Dec 2 20:02:59 2009 +0100
include/linux/spinlock.h includes spin_unlock_wait() to wait for a concurrent
holder of a lock. this patch just moves over to that API. spin_unlock_wait
covers both raw_spinlock_t and spinlock_t so it should be safe here as well.
the added rt-variant of read_seqbegin in include/linux/seqlock.h that is being
modified, was introduced by patch:
seqlock-prevent-rt-starvation.patch
patch is on top of 3.12.1-rt4
behavior should be unchanged.
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@hofr.at>
---
include/linux/seqlock.h | 3 +--
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/seqlock.h b/include/linux/seqlock.h
index 142c0f7..019a936 100644
--- a/include/linux/seqlock.h
+++ b/include/linux/seqlock.h
@@ -236,8 +236,7 @@ repeat:
* Take the lock and let the writer proceed (i.e. evtl
* boost it), otherwise we could loop here forever.
*/
- spin_lock(&sl->lock);
- spin_unlock(&sl->lock);
+ spin_unlock_wait(&sl->lock);
goto repeat;
}
return ret;
--
1.7.2.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] consolidate spin_lock/unlock waiting with spin_unlock_wait
2013-12-02 4:41 [PATCH] consolidate spin_lock/unlock waiting with spin_unlock_wait Nicholas Mc Guire
@ 2013-12-15 13:44 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior @ 2013-12-15 13:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nicholas Mc Guire; +Cc: linux-rt-users, Thomas Gleixner
* Nicholas Mc Guire | 2013-12-02 05:41:26 [+0100]:
>>From 19ac7e10b38947dbd8d731a13243fb28490f5ab4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>From: Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@hofr.at>
>Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2013 23:03:52 -0500
>Subject: [PATCH] consolidate spin_lock/unlock waiting with spin_unlock_wait
>
> since:
> commit c2f21ce2e31286a0a32f8da0a7856e9ca1122ef3
> Author: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Date: Wed Dec 2 20:02:59 2009 +0100
>
> include/linux/spinlock.h includes spin_unlock_wait() to wait for a concurrent
> holder of a lock. this patch just moves over to that API. spin_unlock_wait
> covers both raw_spinlock_t and spinlock_t so it should be safe here as well.
> the added rt-variant of read_seqbegin in include/linux/seqlock.h that is being
> modified, was introduced by patch:
> seqlock-prevent-rt-starvation.patch
>
> patch is on top of 3.12.1-rt4
>
> behavior should be unchanged.
Applied. One note: you indented the comment by one space. It looked to
me like cited to complete commit. Please do commit-id ("one line
description) and avoid the one line space at the begin of everyline if
possible.
Sebastian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-12-15 13:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-12-02 4:41 [PATCH] consolidate spin_lock/unlock waiting with spin_unlock_wait Nicholas Mc Guire
2013-12-15 13:44 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).