From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: pavel@pavlinux.ru
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Carsten Emde <C.Emde@osadl.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RT 0/8] Linux 3.2.53-rt76-rc1
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 10:09:21 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140116100921.6ecbf214@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52D7EE70.8000509@pavlinux.ru>
On Thu, 16 Jan 2014 18:36:32 +0400
Pavel Vasilyev <pavel@pavlinux.ru> wrote:
> 16.01.2014 18:18, Steven Rostedt пишет:
> > On Thu, 16 Jan 2014 13:41:16 +0400
> > Pavel Vasilyev <pavel@pavlinux.ru> wrote:
> >
> >> 16.01.2014 05:58, Steven Rostedt пишет:
> >>> Dear RT Folks,
> >>>
> >>> This is the RT stable review cycle of patch 3.2.53-rt76-rc1.
> >>
> >> Yap..., mainline is 3.2.54 !
> >>
> >
> > Yeah, but I already had the -rt specific changes merged into 3.2.53
> > before 3.2.54 was released, and then I discovered the cpu hotplug bug.
> > I did not want to release that -rc until it was solved. Now that it is,
> > I can release this one and then move to 3.2.54.
>
>
> $ xz -cd /tmp/patch-3.2.53-rt75-rt76-rc1.patch.xz | patch -p1 --dry-run
>
> checking file arch/arm/kernel/smp_tlb.c
> checking file arch/tile/include/asm/smp.h
> checking file arch/tile/kernel/smp.c
> checking file drivers/net/wireless/orinoco/orinoco_usb.c
> checking file drivers/usb/gadget/f_fs.c
> checking file drivers/usb/gadget/inode.c
> checking file fs/buffer.c
> checking file include/linux/smp.h
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 117 with fuzz 1 (offset 16 lines).
> Hunk #2 FAILED at 147.
> 1 out of 2 hunks FAILED
> checking file include/linux/spinlock_rt.h
> checking file kernel/cpu.c
> checking file kernel/rtmutex.c
> checking file kernel/smp.c
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 712.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED
> checking file kernel/softirq.c
> checking file kernel/timer.c
> checking file localversion-rt
>
>
> include/linux/smp.h REJECT: #define on_each_cpu_mask() and #define
> on_each_cpu_cond() and same in kernel/smp.c
>
>
Ouch, thanks for letting me know. I'll give it a try to make sure that
the patch is the same code that I tested.
-- Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-16 15:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-16 1:58 [PATCH RT 0/8] Linux 3.2.53-rt76-rc1 Steven Rostedt
2014-01-16 1:58 ` [PATCH RT 1/8] cpu_down: move migrate_enable() back Steven Rostedt
2014-01-16 1:58 ` [PATCH RT 2/8] swait: Add a few more users Steven Rostedt
2014-01-16 1:58 ` [PATCH RT 3/8] lockdep: Correctly annotate hardirq context in irq_exit() Steven Rostedt
2014-01-16 1:58 ` [PATCH RT 4/8] rtmutex: use a trylock for waiter lock in trylock Steven Rostedt
2014-01-16 3:08 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-01-17 4:22 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-01-17 5:17 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-01-31 22:07 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2014-02-01 4:21 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-02-01 4:54 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-01-16 1:58 ` [PATCH RT 5/8] smp: introduce a generic on_each_cpu_mask() function Steven Rostedt
2014-01-16 1:58 ` [PATCH RT 6/8] smp: add func to IPI cpus based on parameter func Steven Rostedt
2014-01-16 1:58 ` [PATCH RT 7/8] fs: only send IPI to invalidate LRU BH when needed Steven Rostedt
2014-01-16 1:58 ` [PATCH RT 8/8] Linux 3.2.53-rt76-rc1 Steven Rostedt
2014-01-16 9:41 ` [PATCH RT 0/8] " Pavel Vasilyev
2014-01-16 14:18 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-01-16 14:36 ` Pavel Vasilyev
2014-01-16 15:09 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2014-01-16 16:08 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-01-16 17:19 ` Pavel Vasilyev
2014-01-16 16:18 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2014-01-17 13:01 ` Rolf Peukert
2014-01-17 13:21 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-01-17 15:40 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140116100921.6ecbf214@gandalf.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=C.Emde@osadl.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=jkacur@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@pavlinux.ru \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).