From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Carsten Emde <C.Emde@osadl.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
<stable-rt@vger.kernel.org>,
Tiejun Chen <tiejun.chen@windriver.com>,
Bin Jiang <bin.jiang@windriver.com>
Subject: [PATCH RT 05/14] rcutree/rcu_bh_qs: disable irq while calling rcu_preempt_qs()
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 22:52:14 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140301035236.516402001@goodmis.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20140301035209.031474616@goodmis.org
[-- Attachment #1: 0005-rcutree-rcu_bh_qs-disable-irq-while-calling-rcu_pree.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1597 bytes --]
3.10.32-rt31-rc2 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Tiejun Chen <tiejun.chen@windriver.com>
Any callers to the function rcu_preempt_qs() must disable irqs in
order to protect the assignment to ->rcu_read_unlock_special. In
RT case, rcu_bh_qs() as the wrapper of rcu_preempt_qs() is called
in some scenarios where irq is enabled, like this path,
do_single_softirq()
|
+ local_irq_enable();
+ handle_softirq()
| |
| + rcu_bh_qs()
| |
| + rcu_preempt_qs()
|
+ local_irq_disable()
So here we'd better disable irq directly inside of rcu_bh_qs() to
fix this, otherwise the kernel may be freezable sometimes as
observed. And especially this way is also kind and safe for the
potential rcu_bh_qs() usage elsewhere in the future.
Cc: stable-rt@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Tiejun Chen <tiejun.chen@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Bin Jiang <bin.jiang@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
kernel/rcutree.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
index 75743cb..5439cee 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
@@ -187,7 +187,12 @@ static void rcu_preempt_qs(int cpu);
void rcu_bh_qs(int cpu)
{
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ /* Callers to this function, rcu_preempt_qs(), must disable irqs. */
+ local_irq_save(flags);
rcu_preempt_qs(cpu);
+ local_irq_restore(flags);
}
#else
void rcu_bh_qs(int cpu)
--
1.8.5.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-01 3:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-01 3:52 [PATCH RT 00/14] Linux 3.10.32-rt31-rc2 Steven Rostedt
2014-03-01 3:52 ` [PATCH RT 01/14] rcu: Dont activate RCU core on NO_HZ_FULL CPUs Steven Rostedt
2014-03-01 3:52 ` [PATCH RT 02/14] timers: do not raise softirq unconditionally Steven Rostedt
2014-03-01 3:52 ` [PATCH RT 03/14] timer: Raise softirq if theres irq_work Steven Rostedt
2014-03-01 3:52 ` [PATCH RT 04/14] timer/rt: Always raise the softirq if theres irq_work to be done Steven Rostedt
2014-03-01 3:52 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2014-03-01 3:52 ` [PATCH RT 06/14] Revert "x86: Disable IST stacks for debug/int 3/stack fault for PREEMPT_RT" Steven Rostedt
2014-03-01 3:52 ` [PATCH RT 07/14] rt: Make cpu_chill() use hrtimer instead of msleep() Steven Rostedt
2014-03-01 3:52 ` [PATCH RT 08/14] kernel/hrtimer: be non-freezeable in cpu_chill() Steven Rostedt
2014-03-01 3:52 ` [PATCH RT 09/14] irq_work: allow certain work in hard irq context Steven Rostedt
2014-03-01 3:52 ` [PATCH RT 10/14] arm/unwind: use a raw_spin_lock Steven Rostedt
2014-03-01 3:52 ` [PATCH RT 11/14] net: ip_send_unicast_reply: add missing local serialization Steven Rostedt
2014-03-01 3:52 ` [PATCH RT 12/14] leds: trigger: disable CPU trigger on -RT Steven Rostedt
2014-03-01 3:52 ` [PATCH RT 13/14] rcu: Eliminate softirq processing from rcutree Steven Rostedt
2014-03-01 3:52 ` [PATCH RT 14/14] Linux 3.10.32-rt31-rc2 Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140301035236.516402001@goodmis.org \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=C.Emde@osadl.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=bin.jiang@windriver.com \
--cc=jkacur@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=stable-rt@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tiejun.chen@windriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).