From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH RT] rwsem: The return of multi-reader PI rwsems
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 15:17:41 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140410151741.617f86d9@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140410153617.GN10526@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014 17:36:17 +0200
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> It defaults to the total number of CPUs in the system, given the default
> setup (all CPUs in a single balance domain), this should result in all
> CPUs working concurrently on the boosted read sides.
Unfortunately, it currently defaults to the number of possible CPUs in
the system. I should probably move the default assignment to after SMP
is setup. Currently it happens in early boot before all the CPUs are
running. On boot up, the limit is set to NR_CPUS which should be much
higher than what the system has, but shouldn't matter during boot. But
after all the CPUs are up and running, it can lower it to online CPUs.
I think I'll go and make v3 of this patch.
-- Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-10 19:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-09 19:19 [RFC PATCH RT] rwsem: The return of multi-reader PI rwsems Steven Rostedt
2014-04-10 14:18 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-04-10 14:28 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-04-10 14:32 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-04-11 2:50 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-04-11 3:25 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-04-11 3:52 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-04-11 4:25 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-04-10 14:44 ` Clark Williams
2014-04-10 15:01 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-04-10 15:03 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2014-04-10 15:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-10 19:17 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2014-04-10 20:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-10 21:30 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-04-10 22:02 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-04-10 15:38 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-04-11 21:39 ` Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2014-04-10 17:42 ` [RFC PATCH RT V2] " Steven Rostedt
2014-04-11 2:35 ` [RFC PATCH RT V3] " Steven Rostedt
2014-04-11 12:47 ` Carsten Emde
2014-04-11 13:25 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-04-17 23:26 ` [RFC PATCH RT V4] " Steven Rostedt
2014-04-18 8:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-04-24 17:52 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-04-14 9:55 ` [RFC PATCH RT] " Ingo Molnar
2014-04-14 13:34 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-04-14 14:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140410151741.617f86d9@gandalf.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
--cc=williams@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).