From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RT 0/3] Linux 3.2.57-rt84-rc1
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 09:39:56 -0400
Message-ID: <20140428093956.78d0f3ea@gandalf.local.home>
References: <20140427143925.177486597@goodmis.org>
	<535D8180.1020607@pavlinux.ru>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Carsten Emde <C.Emde@osadl.org>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>,
	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
To: pavel@pavlinux.ru
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <535D8180.1020607@pavlinux.ru>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-rt-users.vger.kernel.org

On Mon, 28 Apr 2014 02:15:28 +0400
Pavel Vasilyev <pavel@pavlinux.ru> wrote:

> 27.04.2014 18:39, Steven Rostedt =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82:
> > Dear RT Folks,
> >
> > This is the RT stable review cycle of patch 3.2.57-rt84-rc1.
> >
> > Please scream at me if I messed something up. Please test the patch=
es too.
>=20
>=20
> More than two years our thin clients (about 5000 machines, Intel Atom=
, x86_32)=20
> work with RCU_BOOST.
>=20
> CONFIG_RCU_BOOST=3Dy
> CONFIG_RCU_BOOST_PRIO=3D80
> CONFIG_RCU_BOOST_DELAY=3D400
>=20

Is this just a confirmation of having RCU_BOOST default y for
PREEMPT_RT is a good thing?

Thanks,

-- Steve