From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steven Rostedt Subject: Re: [patchlet] locking/rt: fix rt_read_lock() lockdep annotation. Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 10:39:10 -0400 Message-ID: <20140509103910.64544b48@gandalf.local.home> References: <20140503170110.GA10652@linutronix.de> <1399449247.5142.14.camel@marge.simpson.net> <20140507094807.229d88d8@gandalf.local.home> <1399471264.5248.5.camel@marge.simpson.net> <1399472415.5248.15.camel@marge.simpson.net> <20140509132713.GH29014@linutronix.de> <1399645080.31219.14.camel@marge.simpson.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , linux-rt-users , Thomas Gleixner , John Kacur To: Mike Galbraith Return-path: Received: from cdptpa-outbound-snat.email.rr.com ([107.14.166.228]:13760 "EHLO cdptpa-oedge-vip.email.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753459AbaEIOjM (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 May 2014 10:39:12 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1399645080.31219.14.camel@marge.simpson.net> Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 09 May 2014 16:18:00 +0200 Mike Galbraith wrote: > No, I had done the right thing in the first patch, as confirmed by what > landed in 12-rt. The lock ain't "shared" is why I whacked it. You saw > what happened to my confidence in that logic when Steven spoke. Eek :) I was confused because the patch didn't apply to my tree :-) -- Steve